The Discussion On "Literary Self-consciousness"

Regarding the theory of"literary self-consciousness", it is a hot topic in Chinese ancient literature, the most influential as Self- Consciousness in"Wei and Jin Dynasty Literature". Since the introduction of the day, it is almost cited by literature researchers for the truth in 80 years of Chinese. Although it has been strongly challenged since the 1980s by the "Han Dynasty literary consciously said," and "Song-consciously literary said", and formed a heated debate in 1996, 1997.But it remains as a "scientific judgment" to continue as Inevitable. However, is this appropriate?Investigation of"literary self-consciousness", it always discusses inseparable on Cao Pi and the subject of his"Code ? On paper". It always researches inseparable on Lu xun and his justice of"Grace and the Wei, Jin, articles and the relationship between drugs and alcohol". In my view, Cao Pi's "paper" is a political declaration, while concerned the aesthetic characteristics, to a very famous point of view"article based on momentum". "Papers" reflects the secular centre of Cao Pi and Aesthetic Center of the idea of integration. Suzuki Torao made the first, "Wei is a literature of the times conscious of the times" and it used by Lu Xun, made a great impact. In my opinion, "Cao Pi is a literature of the times conscious of the times", said by Lu Xun, was a humorous purely. However, for the Suzuki Torao, he did not expect his thesis quoted by Chinese scholars and influence China nearly a century of the history of literature written. For Lu Xun, he is still unexpected, using some language in a speech become China's literary history of the development process an important yardstick. For Li Zehou, "the history of the Aesthetics" has brought miraculous changes to his life. For the scholars who study on Chinese history of ancient literary criticism, since the 1980s, a huge trap is waiting for them to drilling, which will in turn can never be a clear statement that the controversy over the situation. With the arrival of the new century, the theory of "the literary consciousness" is still divergent, but this time the scholars do more work is the reflection.I believe that "literature of consciousness" is a false proposition. At least, under the premise that we can not clearly answered "What is literature". Since from the beginning of the 20th century to the arrival of the new century, many scholars maintaining the "pure literature" as the useful weapon, under the impact in the western concept of the theory of evolution, far away from the literary world to showcase the soul of human nature. In fact, "Pure Literature" itself is a "Literature Fairy Tale."At the same time, the areas of philosophy as a "consciousness" uncommon for in-depth exposition, is also a confusing proposition. Although the author is equally difficult to give the answer on "Literature is what", but at least can made statement that "literature is not what. On the"literary self-consciousness", led to a lot of interesting issues, it similar has brought new thinking to the literature research. But I believe that many of these issues have deviated from the main track of literary performance the human soul. The urgent need to break the concept of evolution, nearly a century and using the concept of "change", and show "a form of sympathy" to the ancients.