Logical Analysis On Sentence "S Is P"

"S is P" is a logical subject of the use of a higher frequency of a layman, this sentence can be used to express proposition, which is the logic of domestic scholars generally agree with the view, but which proposition it can express and if "collective concept" involved in the concept of the classification on the earth? Different scholars have different opinions, it has not been determined so far. on the basis of previous studies ,the paper start from the relationship between the proposition and sentences, ,we analyze Sentence " S is P" logically, which said: "S is P" not only can be used to express that Proposition Set , but can be used to express the non-collection proposition not only can be used to express the full name and single proposition but also can be used to express Table added Dator. S and P can represent single concept or common concept separately, So"S is P" has diversified meaning,which depends on what kind of characteristics of concept in the classification.Since the extension of the concept as the standard, it be divided into separate concepts and universal concept, it is impossible and there is no need to further divided into the so-called "collective concept", therefore, we make a conclusion: " traditional logic textbooks should reject 'collective concept '. " These subjects are the basis of logic, and the resolution domestic logic textbooks in the Sentence "S is P" as well as the current study, and then raise questions with the subject of this paper.Chapter II. Sentence"S is P" has diversified meanings. According to the before S is determined by the different characteristics in the sentence "S is P",thus the sentence has diversified meaning. this sentence can be used to express different types of Proposition types , it can give a explaination and evidence for "the same words can express different judge (Proposition)"in chapter 1.Chapter III. Opened shrouded in "S is P" Sentence on the fog. This chapter undertaking above, as S in sentence "S is P" can act as different concepts.then, it inevitably involves the concept of classification. This article holds that the concept of the classification will be divided into the concept of "collective concept" and "non-pool concept" is the wrong paste, and then gives reason.Finally, we point out "traditional logic textbooks should reject 'collective concept'".Chapter IV. Context determines Sentence" S is P" .this chapter highlights how context determines "S is P " express simple proposition, special proposition,full name Proposition and compound proposition. Papu law leads to some rules, and thus derived the new rules, and point out ultimately whether these new rules can be accepted as the rules in the form theory of Beliefs. This method is to make "S is P" Sentence symbols, abstract, to integrate traditional logic and the modern logic organically, so as to t provide convincing evidence for mutual infiltration of the two branches of logic.Innovation: 1, highlight Sentence"S is P" has diversified meanings. 2, use Papu law to lead to new rules, try to make Sentence"S is P"" symbolize, abstract.