The Proportionality Of Moral Rights And Moral Obligation

By the discussion of the proportionality of moral rights and moral obligation, this paper attempts to answer such a question: what does moral obligation mean for the individuals? Or in other words, why the individuals must be so? Is merely because such action is the moral requirement? The obligation is always connected with the right. Then the best way to explain moral obligation is with the corresponding rights. Therefore, we set the proportionality of moral rights and moral obligation as the premise to answer this question. However, for various reasons, moral rights and moral obligation doesn't goes like this. So, in order to prove the proportionality of moral rights and moral obligation, above all we must make clear that why such a recognition in the field of ethics appeared, namely they are not appropriate, the theoretical background of this kind of recognition, as well as the difficulties leaded by this kind of cognition, and we must find possible approaches to solve these difficulties simultaneously: we must take the external stipulated principal part and the limited obligation into consider. Based on this we need to carry on the re-planning of moral rights and moral obligation, because we have got enough reason to believe that only start off from the different starting point with the past, could we obtain the anticipated answer - - moral rights as the "qualifications" and moral obligation as "Officiis" are brought into our field of vision. This viewpoint highlighted two aspects: firstly, moral rights and moral obligation originated from the society, as the antecedence to decide the personal status in society, is the antecedence condition of individual existence and existence state; Secondly, moral rights and moral obligation linked together through that recondite consent, we act not only for the purpose of achieving it, but also it is being implemented. Furthermore, we can chase down the proportionality of moral rights and moral obligation from the inside and outside aspects via its antecedence, deconstruction the contradiction engendered by depriving the proportionality of moral rights and moral obligation, so that the problem we faced will be satisfied answered: only when we make great efforts to promote the corresponding proportionality realized in the reality, we act not only in order to achieve our own happiness, but the happiness lies in our behaviors; can we say that our behaviors not only to create a brand new world, but we are in such a world.