| According to Chinese grammatical rhetoric, lexiculogy, grammatical, rhetoric, the article focuses on analysis of stylistic features of public security instruments compared its differences with the daily conversation of language and the style of literature, and summarizes the counter measures of misuse of phrases.At first, the article analyzes the basic features of the language of public security instruments forming in the process of its development and improvement. These features include accuracy, concise, plain and simple, solemn, specifications and so on. Both of these five clear distinction, hare intrinsically linked. Understanding and a good master of public security instrument features is conducive to the public to the public security workers do word processing work and improve their work quality.Secondly, in order to further deepen the understanding of the public security instrument, the article used a comparing approach to analyze specifically its difference with day to day conversations language and literature writing, and summarized the specific characteristics of public security instrument in terms of the use of language, phrases and rhetoricThirdly, in viea of the public security instrument in the specific language use, there are many problems, the paper mainly summarized eleven commom styles of errors from the words, grammatical and rhetoric. This style of errors from that were lacking in terms of language features, the word election inappropriate, word repetition, fuzzy semantic, improper word order, mismatches, components imcomplexe, redundant components, sentence wrong combination, coinage abuse, emotional neglect.Finally, the paper focuses on mading counter measures in terms of the word, grammatical, rhetoric against the common errors and overall features of public security instruments. |