| Mohammed Ali Jinnah is a Nationalism Movement leader of South Asia in the first half of 20th century,and also is the creator of Pakistan. A role which he acted was not throughout invariable in political stage of South Asia.Before in middle of 1930's , Jinnah was called "Ambassador of Hindu-Muslim unity", he advocated Hindu-Muslim unity to achieve India independence by constitutional government way. Therefore, he spent three times making India Hindu-Muslim cooperation and establishing the counter-England united front. During these work,he has ever made Hindu and Muslim arriving at Lucknow Pact in 1916, it was the only unity agreement which two big communities made in colonial ruling time. In the later of 1930's, Jinnah gradually became Muslim separatist and inherited "Two Nations" theory, founded sole Muslim's Pakistan and became father of Pakistan.Which something casused Jinnah to change his role? The value of ambassador's role gradually was relinquished by Gandhi's emergence and communalism's rising ,as made Jinnah feel disappointed at the role and finally gave it up he acted. In this process, Muslim cultural nationalist Iqbal has also influenced on Jinnah, who guided Jinnah in the key historical time and made him choose new role separatism leader of Indian Muslims.These two factors interacted and finally caused Jinnah to walk on Muslim separatism path.Jinnah who changed his role produced important influence on political trend of Indian subcontinent, he united Muslims in the flag of Muslim League and led Muslim League to become the only representative organization of the Indian Muslims.The Pakistan Resolution was passed at Muslim League's Lahore session because of Jinnah's direction, Muslim separatism political line formally set up. In World War II, Jinnah led Muslim League to adopt the counter-Congress policy and stood on Britain's side. In the postwar , ,he persisted on the Pakistan principle on each kind of negotiations, which caused the Indian subcontinent inevitably to move towards the fission.Jinnah as a gerat historical man, we should assess objectively and fairly his work in political stage of South Asia. |