A Comparison Of Heidegger's And Husserl's The Concept Of Phenomenon In The Early Phase

The most effective approach studying the philosophical thinking of Heidegger and Husserl are the comparison of two people systematically. What has Heidegger inherited after all from Husserl there? What does he illumine from the Husserl? How to treat the philosophy of Heidegger by Husserl? These problems are all the key of studying. Husserl and Heidegger crash just as long as two thought giant stone. Giving way to them, they not only may produce out a spark, but also be able to collide with out a rift. We peep at the core nature part arriving at them and this is also a thinking clue of the main body of a book even though being a narrow gap.Concentrate on comparing of the early phase thinking, because of Husserl and Heidegger have exchange much in early phase. Husserl didn't read the article of Heidegger any longer. Two people's thoughts also keep away from gradually as friendship after self-autumn in 1929. Therefore, Husserl's early phase defining 1929 is early phase relevant to Heidegger before autumn. But Heidegger's early phase is to abort extremely Sein und Zeit,because that this is whose early phase thought having a comprehensive expression. Such time paragraph division is that the inherent correlation judging by two people's thought exchanges.The concept concerns phenomenon with conceptual complicated field always since needing to be in upper historic examination owing to the person. Through the certainty of the concept of pheomenon, we can understand that the difference of their earlier thinking, that what Heidegger inherit from Husserl.It is the concept that phenomenon mimics being cored mostly. It is the premise what is study of phenomenon we understand. Between Husserl's study of phenomenon and Heidegger's study of phenomenon, the significant difference and divergence are all to originate from the diversity that one word understanding mounts to phenomenon. They are to use the same slogan on different phenomenon import:"Zur Sache selbst!"Tracing to the source of revealing their difference may display their nature location just now.Heidegger studies comparing with Husserl early phase thought phenomenon. Consciousness field having discussed the respective phenomenon, phenomenon understood by Husserl mainly being to describe study of phenomenon in the first chapter. But Heidegger's phenomenon is that existence there exists person's in study of phenomenon's existence. The conceptual Sein und Zeit with Husserl's introduction seventh section of edge notes studies as the document the phenomenon being two people discussing mainly in second chapters. Concentrate on analyzing Logische Untersuchungen to Heidegger's enlightenment and Husserl to conceptual Heidegger phenomenon attitude; come to accomplish the comparison research to two people on this account. But that conceptual Heidegger phenomenon can traces the category arriving at Husserl is penetrating, plain thing being able to trace back to front theory in oneself in Heidegger. But can perceive Husserl in being full of a question between them, doubt that in Husserl note and comment, some do not approve even. From Husserl's point of view, Heidegger philosophy is short of clear very much. Also philosophy has not been treated as strict science and, has already realized that Heidegger faces a problem and having the problem. In Husserl early phase thought, what Heidegger has inherited after all? To a certain extent, very difficult to say be positive inheriting, I think that more fields are to reflective nature profoundly inheriting. This is also that starting point is different because of two people, that Husserl is that problem, lasts judging from epistemology the modern times angle is Kantian tradition. Heidegger is that the angle from ontology inspects problem, lasting is ancient Greece philosophy tradition. This is one kind of the restoration rising of west philosophy. Need to know twenty-first century philosophy transforming, relation has deep understanding, ability to six philosophy inherence appear on very good carding developing a logic to two personal inheriting only when having the sober cognition to Husserl and Heidegger.It is known that the introduction of that work which made Heidegger famous and with respect to which he never ceased to gage the stages of his path of thinking, defined the method of investigation undertake in that work to be phenomenological. It is also known that Heidegger recognized his debt to Husserl in the same text when he wrote at the end of the"Exposition of the Question of the Meaning ofBeing""The following investigation would not have been possible if the ground had not been prepared by Edmund Husserl, with whose Logische Untersuchungen phenomenology first emerged.Husserl's Logische Untersuchungen was published in 1900, this great original century book marked the conversion from the tradition philosophy to the modern times philosophy. Although Husserl insists that be that tradition epistemology problem, but he has suggested that brand-new philosophy method phenomenon learns method within philosophy the modern times range. Heidegger has no need of verbosity here to twenty centuries philosophy depths of affecting. The core connotation learning, being also Heidegger philosophy of the initiation that Heidegger's phenomenon mimics being Heidegger philosophy. It opposes the epistemology center the modern times in an open manner commenting on tradition, the radical epistemology center having overcome Husserl comments on position, he suggests that existence comments on study of phenomenon, transformed to such an extent as origin happened in the two thousand Europe philosophy reaching textual study of phenomenon.