Through discussing the structure of"Væˆ1"and"Væˆ2", this article detects their syntactic function and the semantic direction of"æˆ". The article emphatically demonstrates the relation of"æˆ1"and"æˆ2", and the difference between the verbs combined with"æˆ1"and the verbs combined with"æˆ2", so as to deepen our cognition of the verbs combined with"æˆ"and help us reclassify these verbs . In addition to research the structure of"Væˆ"in synchronic plane of modern Chinese , we also tentatively probe into the process of the lexicalization of the structure of"Væˆ"in diachronic angle.On the basis of the former's study results , we think that"æˆ1"has all kinds of connections with"æˆ2". Generally speaking ,"æˆ1"and"æˆ2"have the same meaning of"realize","æˆ1"indicates a kind of realization of result , and"æˆ2"indicates a kind of a realization of change .Because of the close relation of"æˆ1"and"æˆ2", the structure of"Væˆ1"and"Væˆ2"have close relation too. So it appears a kind of new structure of"Væˆ", that is, the"æˆ"in the structure of"Væˆ"can not only be comprehended into"æˆ1"but also be comprehended into"æˆ2".Usually , people think the syntagmatic relation between a verb and"æˆ1"or"æˆ2"is unrestricted , such as"一个月写æˆ1一个ä¸ç¯‡å°è¯´","他把å°è¯´ä¸çš„主人公写æˆ2一个民æ—英雄","昨天熬胶没熬æˆ1","稀é¥éƒ½è®©ä»–给熬æˆ2糊嘎巴儿了". But this view is neither transparent nor exact. There are several reasons to prove it. Firstly , some verbs , such as"æ¥","æ»", can only combine with"æˆ1",while some other verbs , such as"æ„","误解", can only with"æˆ2". Secondly , to the verbs like"写","熬","Væˆ1"and"Væˆ2"can only be transformed on the phrasal level , and it is not...
|