Mobile Canon

Canon is defined as an outstanding text with great achievements in a certain aspect that can be used as prototype. This thesis explored the canonization procedure of the "17 Years Literature" through the great effects of all aspects in the canonization of the "Starts an Undertaking History". By summarizing the external and internal reasons of the canonization of the "Starts an Undertaking History", the article investigated the interactive effects among the writer, the readers, the work, and the age of the work. The time evolution of the position in literature for the "Starts an Undertaking History", meanwhile, indicated that the canonization of the "17 Years Literature" is fluidic and uncertain. The thesis includes the following four sessions,1.Introduction. Elaborating all sorts of definitions related to canon.2.Exploring the canonization procedure of the "17 Years Literature" through the inspections of the great effects from the ranking variation of publishing house and press company, the unreserved affirmation from the committee composed of writers and artists, the enthusiastic analysis and praising by critics, the intensive literature argument, and the authority of literature history during the canonization of the "Starts an Undertaking History".3. Analyzing the reasons of canonization for the "Starts an Undertaking History" in 1960s. The external reasons include the explanation of the "legitimacy" of the country policy, the specific request of "canons" and "heroes" called by the age, Liuqing's charming political personality, and the pursuit of writers for canon; the internal reasons include the deep reflections of themes, the successful shaping of the characters, the combination of revolution romanticism and realism in literature creation, the epic style, and other artistic achievements.4. Summarizing the studies of the "Starts an Undertaking History", including the studies in the early 1980's, the criticism in the discussion of the " Rewriting of Literature History ", the studies since 1990s, the negligence in the "Canons in a Hundred Year", and the treatment in the current literature history and literature work, to indicate the changes on what is canon and who is supposed to define canon.5. Conclusion. The canons of "17 Years Literature" are dynamic and fluidic, and the test on them is still being carried on.