"Small And Big" Of Chuangtze And Concerning Historical Interpretation

As the first topic of "Xiaoyao Three Debate", "The Small And Big" is a very important problem to the scholars - not only because the "Big Debate" is the the first question of《Xiaoyao Tour》, but also because does it as of "Meaning of Xiaoyao". therefore, various opinions of explainatin on the issure played an important role in study of Chuangtze and enriching of material for philosophy in history.Meanwhile, the "Small And Big" aesthetic theory is quite important as an example of strength of character Qiyun, on the development of aesthetic thought in ancient China.Discrimination between "Small and Big" of the contrast around meaning to start, a DIY theme is presented in accordance with image gradually expand, "Small and Large" as the first topic of "Xiaoyao Third Debate" is all about the "anomaly" of the Xiaoyao concept spreaded. However, the history of the "Small And Big" interpretation, could be divided abusively to each other by representatives,as Guo Xiang, Zhi Dun, Cheng Xuanying, Wang Pang, Lv hui Qing, Lin Xiyi, Luo Miandao, etc., or by the core sub-topics " Adaptive Xiaoyao, "" Xiaoyao to be free ","Zhuang and Yi"," Xiaoyao as sartisficed "," Happy merits, ", or by the relationship between "Small And Big" as" independent of self-sub ","Ignorance of size" and "Chong Tai suppressing small".Therefore, Commentaries on the review or analysis of various can be historical imperative.Metaphysics spreaded in Zhuang Taoism in Wei and Jin Dynasty into the mainstream of academia. since the express of Xiang Xiu and Guo Xiang, small big all-win should apply the doctrine of self-divided to create a tradition. Peripateticism traditional interpretation of the first, but its vague a "proper" and "complacent" distinction, in addition, "Small and Large" and it has not a solid theoretical basis. As Zhi Dun pointed out, Guo made a counter dial in order to "clear the nature of its typical" non-concept to be Xiaoyao Xiaoyao can avoid the difficulties in Zhi Dun's world, but the non-centered world views different from the world of Zhuang Zi. Wang Pang lead the mainstream of the fusion of Yi and Zhuang,. Linxi Yi and Luo Mian Dao put forward their evidence to the contrary, but reflects the confluence of three of the more obvious trends. Chong Ming Yi Xiao in Qing Dynasty gradually textual study, mainly appeal to "worship big restraining small" features.Xiang,Guo Peripateticism flawed in the argument, independent of their world view, while sufficient to support the size of the adaptive view of its nature Xiaoyao, still can not withstand scrutiny, Zhi Dun sharply pointed out how it has confused two different standards. he deviated from the original intention, but the two Commentaries on the later of the Zhuangtze study played a great impact, and therefore the development of philosophy of metaphysics is to reveal the meaning of the key steps Chuangtze. The "Small and Large" real develo, the text should be "irrational" or "inconsistent with the public." This "anomaly" was no demand for inner contentment and sense of compromise in order to eliminate all barriers in the subjective world to mark the establishment of the free and unrestricted view of the absolute《Xiaoyao Tour》.