Analysis Of Biomedical Basic Research Cooperarion And Competition

Research purposesThe biological medicine high-tech fields have become the forefront, given its major scientific, economic, and social significance, the fierce competition. The biomedical research in our country is in relatively backward. This study aims to scientific research in the field of typical case analysis, the group characteristics and successful reason, for our biomedical research and scientific management provide reference basis, thereby helps our core competitiveness of biomedical research.Research objectThe process of DNA found, Stem cell research frontiers of classical papers, 1901-2005 winner of the Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine.Research methodsA quantitative description of stem cell research papers cooperation, classic 1901-2005 winners of the Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine at work experience and 55 winners Of SCI papers cooperation,Scientific analysis of stem cell research two measuring map of the frontier branch papers led cooperation.Research results1, Stem cell research frontiers classic papers and a high degree of cooperation and collaboration are increasing.Analyze DNA found discussion in the process of competition and cooperation,The co-authored proportion of TOP20 paper is 95%, The people were in 10.60, number of institutions and the number of countries were respectively; 1.45 and 4.35In 2001-2006 human embryonic stem cell research aspects of cultivating core papers, and all the people that were 10.60 number of institutions in several countries, were 2.95 to 1.14; 2001-2006 cancer stem cells research papers and papers, all the people were 6.32, number of institutions in several countries, were 3.05 for multinational cooperation, the thesis 1.23 total number of papers 22.73%.From time in TOP20 stem-cell field, papers and two branches of the frontier core direction of partners, cooperative organizations and number of countries are increasing.2 The Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine prize winner SCI, single paper cooperation rate is high 55 Winners of Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine prize winner of 11160 papers published before SCI, among which, the thesis 1175 independent 9985 papers and cooperation of the total number of papers 89.47% proportion of cooperation 3, The winners of the Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine before winning engineering, learning experience 184 prize winners of the Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine before average university, who were 1.73 parts of two countries or multinational learning experience, The number of national work and number of institutions are higher than the learning therein, Two-thirds Of winners of the highest degree awarding units and work units nearly belongs to the world top 200 university.Conclusions1, Biomedical research fields are increasingly fierce competition, and the rhythm is an inevitable trend in the development of cooperation. From the operation mode, except for the cooperation between scientists, individual, has evolved into a including scientific research institution or the equivalence between the university and the cooperation between disciplines, and through cooperation between governments of cooperation with many meanings of "big cooperation".2, Biomedical research, seeking common points while reserving differences in "micro" for the unique characteristic, the development, the macro level competition paradigm to all human civilization and power compatible for human health and civilization progress.suggestion1 Scientific authority should lead, create a new frontier fields, and support and encourage his heritage, cultural, scientific research team maintenance team of development,2 After picking from art scholar, learners will stand in the network platform giants, adaptive crossover, and comprehensive subject to more complex scientific problems,3, Scientific research management should fully application of competition and cooperation, adjust lever balance in research activities, creating "flowering, contend academic atmosphere, the power of the team, innovation and development.The subject of innovation.The study found the process from the DNA, and the frontier qualitative elite group of scientific research and scientific output of quantitative analysis Angle of three basic research in the biomedical domain, and characteristics of logistics summarized the concurrence of contemporary biomedical research paradigm.Continue to develop our researchChoose the more extensive research group, discipline, and thorough analysis, understand the phenomenon of competition between different subjects, scientific research group in different levels and influence of the similarities and differences between the phenomenon of competition, in order to reveal the phenomenon of competition in the scientific research work.