Systematic Reviews Of PLF Versus PLIF Surgical Treatment Of Adult Spondylolisthesis Efficacy

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of PLF versus PLIF surgical treatment of adult spondylolisthesis. Thus, under the premise of a larger sample size are two ways to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis and securityMethodsComputer search CNKI(1999-2009), CBM(1999-2009), NCBI(1999-2009), Manually search for related Chinese language magazines. Collect all the PLF and PLIF surgical treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis compared the clinical efficacy of randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort study of clinical literature. And to evaluate the methodological quality of included literature.ResultsWere included A randomized controlled study and seven prospective clinical cohort study Meta analysis showed that:1. Postoperative complications occurred:with the PLF compared to the treatment of adult spondylolisthesis, PLIF higher incidence of complications (P=0.01) 2.PLIF treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis good bony fusion (P<0.01) 3.PLF the treatment of adult spondylolisthesis better clinical efficacy (P= 0.04) 4.PLIF the amount of bleeding and operation time was significantly higher than PLF (P<0.01)ConclusionWith the PLF compared, PLIF higher rate of complications, poor clinical efficacy, the amount of bleeding and operation time was significantly higher than PLF, but the PLIF fusion rate was significantly higher than PLF The lack of RCT articles on this subject and sample causes less for on two surgical aspects and postoperative in the second operation on issues such as the overall rehabilitation of further study, the conclusions of this paper is only a reference value.