The Effects Of Electrophysiology To The Adolescents With Cervical Spondylosis Interfered With The Massage Of Adjusting Spine And Dredging Energy Channel

Objective:1. Contrast the difference of somatosensory evoked potential,brainstem auditory evokedpotential and electromyogram to healthiness adolescent, to substantiate the state of the spinalcord,vicinity nerve and the blood vessel,muscle interrelated, and to infer. the theoretic basic ofadolescents with cervical spondylosis..2. According to contrast the difference of curative effect between two groups, and todetermine before and after treatment, to achieve the objective index from microcosmic of themassage of adjusting spine and dredging energy channel,, to provide the objective evidence ofthe curative effect, and to provide the theoretic foundation for spreading on treatmenthenceforth..Methods:1. 64 adolescents with cervical spondylosis according with bringing standard, determinedsomatosensory evoked potential,brainstem auditory evoked potential and electromyogramsolely, contrast with 35 healthiness adolescents.2. These Patients above-mentioned were divided into two group randomly 33 patients(treatgroup), treated with the massage of adjusting spine and dredging energy channel), 31 patients(control group), treated with traction.. Appraised the curative effect, and electrophysiology,before and after treat 2 weeks between two groups.Results:1. The two group somatosensory evoked potential before treatment had a little diffencewith the same term healthiness adolescents, but there is not statistical significance betweenpatients and healthiness adolescents (P＞0.05). The index of every patients in the normal range2. The two group brainstem auditory evoked potential before treatment had a little diffencewith the same term healthiness adolescents,. a few patients exceeded the normal range, butthere is not statistical significance between patients and healthiness Adolescents. (P＞0.05)3. Two group integrated electromyogram before treatment were increased than the sameterm healthiness adolescents, with significant difference(P＜0.05). The index of treat groupwere lower than pretreatment after 2 weeks, with significant difference(P＜0.05), but there isnot statistical significance in control group (P＞0.05).4. Two group clinical appearance integrative scores (including subjective ache,objectiveache and moving range of the cervical) before treatment were higher than the same termhealthiness Adolescents, with significant difference(P＜0.05). The scores of two group werelower than pretreatment after 2 weeks, with significant difference(P＜0.05), The scores oftreat group were lower than the control group, with significant difference(P＜0.05).5. The total availability rate is 90.9％in treat group, and in control group 72.9％, which hasa significant difference between the two groups (P＜0.05).Conclusions:1. The examination of electrophysiology prompts there is not statistical injure to the spinalcord and nerve root among adolescents' with cervical spondylosis.2. The examination of electrophysiology prompts adolescents' cervical spondylosis canemerge the pathology range of VBI, with the relative symptom.3. The examination of electrophysiology prompts adolescents cervical spondylosis destroiesmargin stability of the cervical first, and destroies the balance of biomechanics internal stabilityin cervical later.4. The massage of adjusting spine and dredging energy channel can amend the clinicsymptoms of adolescents' cervical spondylosis.5. The massage of adjusting spine and dredging energy channel can mitigate convulsion ofthe muscle, amend function of the muscle, and then adjust margin stability of the cervical,resume the normal balance of biomechanics.