| It is argued that whether it is proper for the kuhn'paradigm, as a theory of philosophy of science, to be used for testing economics . kuhn left a question which is still unresolved: it is a doubt that whether there is a paradigm in social science. These problems caused the necessity to deeply understand kuhn's paradigm. The understanding ways in this article has the feature of positivism. First , by going back to kuhn, the article's analysis and understanding to paradigm is in documental sense, intending to clear the contents and ranges of paradigm. Then , the article analysize marginal revolution, classical economics and neo-classical economics which are closely connected with the marginal revolution, intending to explore the paradigm and paradigm's revolution. On the basis of these understanding and analysis , the article make some further reflection to the theory of paradigm. |