Re-study On The Red Army’s Northward Resistance Against Japanese Aggression

The Red Army established the strategic policy of the northward Resistance against Japanese Aggression during the long march in 1930 s,which was a major initiatives by the Communist Party of China with Mao Zedong as the core in the critical moment of national crisis and for carrying out their original aspiration and mission.The strategy and action of the Red Army’s northward Resistance against Japanese Aggression is of great significance to the victory of the long march of the Red Army and the rise of a new climax of the national movement of Resistance against Japanese Aggression.However,in the study of the long march of the Red Army,there is such a tendency.In the name of "re evaluating the history of the long march",they misinterpreted the historical facts on the way of the long march.History of the Long March is an example.The author completely reversed the historical facts of the relationship between Mao Zedong and Zhang Guotao on the Long March,which seriously violated the historical facts and must be refuted.From the reasons of the Red Army’s northward Resistance against Japanese Aggression,Mao Zedong and others gradually determined and implemented the strategic policy of the Red Army in the Long March,which is the inevitable requirement of the original aspiration and the mission of Chinese Communists.It was under the call of the original aspiration and the mission of Chinese Communists became a strong force to Resistance against Japanese Aggression and save the country after the September 18 th Incident.After the failure of fifth anti-encirclement campaign,the Central Red Army was forced to carry out the Long March,but this does not mean that the long march of the Red Army was completely passive.The Red Army’s northward Resistance against Japanese Aggression was the active choice of the party and the Red Army in the long march.The great significance of this historical event can be seen only by putting the Red Army’s northward Resistance against Japanese Aggression in the great history of the Chinese people resisting foreign aggression since the modern times,especially in the great struggle of the Chinese people against Japanese invaders since the September 18th Incident.From the perspective of the leading group of the Red Army’s northward Resistance against Japanese Aggression,the re establishment of Mao Zedong’s leading position in the party and the Red Army is an inevitable choice in history.The tragic defeat of the Battle of Xiang River prompted the Red Army commanders and fighters to reflect on the line and command of the temporary central committee.They further realized the serious harm of the “Leftist” dogmatists to the party and the Red Army,and urgently required Mao Zedong to re direct the strategic actions of the Red Army.In this case,the establishment of Mao Zedong’s leadership is an inevitable choice in history,which is of great significance to the strategic development of the party and the Red Army.However,historical nihilism thinks that this is an "opportunity" given by history and an accidental event of history.This is wrong.From the perspective of the development process of the Red Army’s northward Resistance against Japanese Aggression,after the first and fourth front armies joined forces,the Party Central Committee determined the specific strategic plan of the strategic policy of the Red Army’s northward Resistance against Japanese Aggression according to the situation after the meeting.However,based on his wrong judgment of the political situation,Zhang Guotao had fundamental differences with the Party Central Committee on the strategic policy and provoked a struggle with the Central Committee.Zhang Guotao’s southward secessionist incident is a manifestation of Zhang Guotao’s projection of his ambition to seize power on his differences with the Party Central Committee and his attempt to command the party with a gun.His final move to the South and the establishment of another anti party "Central Committee" are the inevitable result of the development of his wrong line and the complete exposure of his separatist behavior.Historical nihilism holds that the debate between Zhang Guotao and the Party Central Committee is that Mao Zedong set a "trap" for Zhang Guotao to fight for military leadership,and transfers Zhang Guotao’s responsibility for splitting the party and the Red Army to Mao Zedong.It is believed that whether the "secret telegram" is the decisive evidence of Zhang Guotao’s split,and that "secret telegram" is a "political communication" Mao Zedong used to explain his going north first with leading the army.These statements are wrong and are the manifestation of trying to cover up the historical facts of Zhang Guotao’s division.From the perspective of the realization of the Red Army’s northward Resistance against Japanese Aggression policy,the union of the three red armies in Northern Shaanxi is the symbol of the realization of the Red Army’s northward Resistance against Japanese Aggression policy.However,historical nihilism holds that the reunion of Northern Shaanxi marks the success of Mao Zedong in seizing the supreme military command from Zhang Guotao.Historical nihilism also fabricated and exaggerated Mao Zedong’s struggle against Zhang Guotao,and held that the purpose of Mao Zedong’s "cruel struggle" against Zhang Guotao was to consolidate and seize military leadership.These statements completely reverse the true relationship between Mao Zedong and Zhangguotao’s differences and struggles,and its fundamental purpose is to break away from the criminal responsibility of Zhang Guotao’s splitting up the party and the Red Army.The reason why the historical nihilism in the study of the Red Army’s northward Resistance against Japanese Aggression distorts and vilifies the discussion of the history lies in the serious misunderstanding in the historical view,methodology and value position on which it is based: the concealment of historical facts,the nihility of historical essence,the generalization of positivist historical methods and the taboo of value position.Based on the critical perspective of historical nihilism,this paper uses the basic position,viewpoint and method of historical materialism and dialectical materialism,takes the formation and practice of the Red Army’s northward Resistance against Japanese Aggression as the logical starting point.By analyzing the viewpoint of historical nihilism in the study of the Red Army’s northward Resistance against Japanese Aggression,this paper points out that its essence is to reverse the truth of history in the name of "re evaluating history".Only by adhering to the guidance of historical materialism,adhering to the comprehensive,historical and dialectical research methods,and standing in the position of the Chinese nation and the Chinese people,can we make an objective and correct historical conclusion.