Consolidation And Transboundary:the Modern Reconstruction Of The Liao-ge Culture Of The Zhuang

Under the background of globalization,urbanization,and modernization,the deconstruction and reconstruction of ethnic culture has become a common phenomenon.Whether the deconstruction of culture is a natural process or man-made,its ultimate trend can be roughly divided into two categories: the first trend breaks the original cultural system,leading to the decline or extinction of culture.the second one givesbirthtocultural consciousness,which triggers re-creation based on traditional culture.Cultural reconstruction is an important form of human cultural practice,the method and path of reconstruction is of great significance to the development and survive of culture.Folk song is an important cultural symbol of the Zhuang in China,the modern reconstruction,as a cultural process or cultural practice in the Zhuang community,should be further explored.Liao-ge’s culture was conceived and rooted mainly in the place between Pingguo and Tiandong in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region,whichlocated in the middle reaches of the Youjiang River.The latestorigin timeis the Ming Dynasty.In the long history,Liao-geblended with the lives of local people and formed a unique cultural tradition,which played a vital role in maintaining the social order and coordinatingpeople’s lives.Entering the 21 st century,with the involvement and participation of multiple social forces,the Liao-ge’s cultural brand building project “Gathering plus Publishing plus Recommended songs plus Festivals” led by the local political circleshas progressed smoothly.Observing the whole process,Liao-ge’s culture has gone through the development of “consolidation to transboundary to consolidation”.During this period,Liao-ge and the singers,the countryside and the external environment have developed a full dialogue and deep integration,and continue to take root in the local area,spread across borders,and integrate into the times.In this way,it not only optimizes the local social environment,enhances the people’s humanistic self-confidence,but also expands the influence of the local society.In a specific field system,Liao-ge’s cultural reconstruction presents a distinctive “inheritance to innovation to reintegration” model characteristics,in which formes the following pattern with the starting point of inheritance intervention:Diverse and symbiotic inheritance intervention groups and stalemate and mutual system inheritance intervention patterns;Driven by innovation and development,promotes the upgrading and transformation of inheritance groups from“self-subject” to “mutual integration”,cultural forms from “lifestyle” to“regional brand”,community functions from “rural order” to “urban ties”;Oriented by the integration of rural areas,it not only pays attention to the establishment and strengthenof the subjective consciousness of the cultural holders,but also responds to the social concerns and development demands of the cultural carrying areas.In essence,the reconstruction of Liao-ge’s culture is an exploration to the modern significance and interrelationship of the “consolidation” and“transboundary” of ethnic culture,which has positive reference significance for the reconstruction of current ethnic culture.First,the interactive promotion of vertical inheritance and horizontal expansion is conducive to enhancing the vitality of ethnic culture and making it more “live”;Second,the superposition of internal structural adjustment and external ecological reorganization can truly activate the current value of ethnic culture,thereby realizing the true bridging and lasting connection between cultural tradition and modern context;Third,the people who promote the practice of cultural reconstruction have multiple identities,which are conducive to promoting the construction of a cultural ecological environment that interacts with multiple fields,and then it is also conducive to promoting the local continuation and external dissemination of ethnic culture.Whether the above three points can be effectively transformed into cultural practice in reality,the rational use of capital in political decision-making is the key.Liao-ge’s cultural reconstruction model and international cultural appeals are mutually confirmed.We need to base ourselves on the“onsolidation” perspective and rely on the “grand history view” to face up to the social value and development laws of ethnic culture under a specific historical background.At the same time,to further initiate innovative thinking,we must also promote ethnic culture to break through ethnic and regional boundaries,connect the value system of the Chinese nation community and the community of shared future for mankind,so as to realize the cross-border sharing of ethnic culture.All of the above should become important value orientations for the reconstruction of ethnic culture in the modern context.