Font Size: a A A

Determination of classification accuracy for land use/cover types using LANDSAT-TM, SPOT-MSS and multipolarized and multi-channel synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data

Posted on:1995-03-11Degree:Ph.DType:Dissertation
University:University of MichiganCandidate:Dondurur, MehmetFull Text:PDF
GTID:1470390014989913Subject:Physics
Abstract/Summary:
The primary objective of this study was to determine the degree to which modern SAR systems can be used to obtain information about the Earth's vegetative resources. Information obtainable from microwave synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data was compared with that obtainable from LANDSAT-TM and SPOT data. Three hypotheses were tested: (a) Classification of land cover/use from SAR data can be accomplished on a pixel-by-pixel basis with the same overall accuracy as from LANDSAT-TM and SPOT data. (b) Classification accuracy for individual land cover/use classes will differ between sensors. (c) Combining information derived from optical and SAR data into an integrated monitoring system will improve overall and individual land cover/use class accuracies.; The study was conducted with three data sets for the Sleeping Bear Dunes test site in the northwestern part of Michigan's lower peninsula, including an October 1982 LANDSAT-TM scene, a June 1989 SPOT scene and C-, L- and P-Band radar data from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory AIRSAR. Reference data were derived from the Michigan Resource Information System (MIRIS) and available color infrared aerial photos. Classification and rectification of data sets were done using ERDAS Image Processing Programs. Classification algorithms included Maximum Likelihood, Mahalanobis Distance, Minimum Spectral Distance, ISODATA, Parallelepiped, and Sequential Cluster Analysis. Classified images were rectified as necessary so that all were at the same scale and oriented north-up. Results were analyzed with contingency tables and percent correctly classified (PCC) and Cohen's Kappa (CK) as accuracy indices using CSLANT and ImagePro programs developed for this study.; Accuracy analyses were based upon a 1.4 by 6.5 km area with its long axis east-west. Reference data for this subscene total 55,770 15 by 15 m pixels with sixteen cover types, including seven level III forest classes, three level III urban classes, two level II range classes, two water classes, one wetland class and one agriculture class. An initial analysis was made without correcting the 1978 MIRIS reference data to the different dates of the TM, SPOT and SAR data sets. In this analysis, highest overall classification accuracy (PCC) was 87% with the TM data set, with both SPOT and C-Band SAR at 85%, a difference statistically significant at the 0.05 level. When the reference data were corrected for land cover change between 1978 and 1991, classification accuracy with the C-Band SAR data increased to 87%.; Classification accuracy differed from sensor to sensor for individual land cover classes, Combining sensors into hypothetical multi-sensor systems resulted in higher accuracies than for any single sensor. Combining LANDSAT-TM and C-Band SAR yielded an overall classification accuracy (PCC) of 92%.; The results of this study indicate that C-Band SAR data provide an acceptable substitute for LANDSAT-TM or SPOT data when land cover information is desired of areas where cloud cover obscures the terrain. Even better results can be obtained by integrating TM and C-Band SAR data into a multi-sensor system.
Keywords/Search Tags:SAR, Data, Classification accuracy, SPOT, LANDSAT-TM, Land, Cover, System
Related items