| The present study investigates self-perceptions of adequacy of support among persons with mental retardation living in (a) suburban and (b) rural environments. Much of the literature on social networks and social support among this population concludes that these persons rely mostly on staff, parents, and other persons with mental retardation for support. Based on this evidence, it is hypothesized that persons living in rural communities are disadvantaged socially when compared with persons living in suburban communities. A case study method (Yin, 1994) was used to assess social support patterns and self-perceived adequacy of support among 8 persons with mental retardation living in semi-independent supported settings (4 rural and 4 suburban). Results indicate that suburban subjects generally had more sources of a variety of support types, used these supports more, and were generally more satisfied with the adequacy of their support when compared with rural subjects. In particular, suburban subjects were more likely to receive employment (e.g., sufficient work hours in satisfying jobs) and family support. Results are discussed in term of implications for service provision for persons with mental retardation living in geographically isolated areas. |
