Font Size: a A A

Geology and petrology of Cretaceous and Tertiary granitic rocks, Lamoille Canyon, Ruby Mountains, Nevada

Posted on:2000-11-21Degree:Ph.DType:Dissertation
University:Texas Tech UniversityCandidate:Lee, Sang-yunFull Text:PDF
GTID:1460390014960637Subject:Geology
Abstract/Summary:
Lamoille Canyon cuts through the northern Ruby Mountain metamorphic core complex and exposes deep interior of the metamorphic core which is characterized by highly metamorphosed miogeoclinal sedimentary rocks and various late Cretaceous and Tertiary granitic intrusions.; Late Cretaceous granitic rocks in Lamoille Canyon can be broadly divided into two groups based on the field relations: equigranular two-mica granitic gneiss and pegmatitic sillimanite-bearing two-mica granitic gneiss. The former rock unit is distinct in its higher concentrations of Fe, Mg, Na, Ca, Sr, V, Zr, Zn, Hf, but lower K, Rb, Th. In spite of these elemental differences, both of the late Cretaceous granitic units in this region are strongly peraluminous, have similar δ18O values, and are closely associated in field. The origin of the pegmatitic two-mica granitic gneiss is best modeled by muscovite-dominated dehydration meting of a metapelitic source, whereas the equigranular two-mica granitic gneiss formed by plagioclase-limited mica (muscovite and/or biotite) dehydration melting of a metapelitic source.; Oligocene biotite monzogranite and related tonalic dikes were emplaced middle crustal levels (5–6 kbar). The biotite monzogranite suite consists of three geochemically distinct sub-groups. Group I shows characteristic geochemical features of A-type granite and is likely to be generated by reaction of mantle derived basaltic magma with either Archean orthogneiss or Proterozoic metapelite, leaving abundant plagioclase, orthopyroxene, and clinopyroxene as cumulative phases. Compared to group I, group II lacks characteristics of A-type granite. Partial melting of a metapelitic source explains most of the observed geochemical and stable isotopic data of group II. Geochemical variations within group I and group II can be explained by fractional crystallization but the possibility of minor crustal assimilation cannot be excluded. The compositions of tonalitic dikes are best explained by magma mixing between mantle derived (?) basaltic magma and granitic magma of group I of the biotite monzogranite suite.; Systematic geochemical comparison between the late Cretaceous and Oligocene granitic intrusions suggests temporal transition from early deep-seated crustal anatexis of a garnet-bearing source in a thickened crust, to later interaction between mantle-derived magma and crust or high-temperature biotite-dehydration melting under shallow crystal environment.
Keywords/Search Tags:Granitic, Canyon, Cretaceous, Magma, Rocks, Biotite
Related items