Font Size: a A A

An investigation of lean blowout of gaseous fuel alternatives to natural gas

Posted on:2014-12-13Degree:Ph.DType:Dissertation
University:University of WashingtonCandidate:Karalus, MeganFull Text:PDF
GTID:1452390008461598Subject:Engineering
Abstract/Summary:
This work examines lean premixed flame stability for multi-component fuel mixtures to support fuel flexibility for industrial combustors. A single Jet Stirred Reactor (JSR), a generic recirculation stabilized combustor, along with gaseous fuels of hydrogen, methane, and hydrogen/methane blends are chosen for the study. Experimental data on blowout are collected and a series of models are used to understand the mechanism of extinction in this recirculation-stabilized flame environment. By studying this more generic combustor, the aim is to develop generalizable results and methodologies for understanding and predicting lean blowout of multicomponent fuels.;In order to gain insight on the mechanism controlling blowout, two dimensional, axisymmetric computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations are carried out for the lean premixed combustion of both hydrogen and methane as the fuel. The fuel flow rate is reduced until the CFD model no longer produces a burning solution. Contour plots from the CFD model illustrate the evolution of the flow-field, temperature profiles, and flame structure within the JSR as blowout is approached for both fuels. The modeling suggests that lean blowout in the JSR does not occur in a spatially homogeneous condition, but rather under a zonal structure.;Two Chemical Reactor Network (CRN) models are developed using the flow field and reaction fields from the detailed CFD models in an attempt to capture the bulk of the physical processes responsible for flame stability. The single Plug Flow Reactor (PFR) model follows the concept of the hypothetical combusting fluid particle and assumes that only convective transport is responsible for stability.;A two PFR model is subsequently developed in which the core jet region (of constant mass flow) exchanges mass with the recirculation region through turbulent diffusive transport. Entrainment of flow by jet action is confined entirely to the recirculation region, represented by the exhaust of the recirculation PFR being convectively re-entrained at its entrance. The two PFR model performs about as well as the single PFR model in predicting blowout for hydrogen in the JSR and shows significant improvement over the single PFR model in both following the experimental data approaching blowout, and predicting the blowout condition for methane. In fact the two PFR model shows good agreement with both equivalence ratio and temperature at blowout across the full range of hydrogen/methane blends.;Regardless of the chemical mechanism applied, or whether we consider transport by convection only as in the single PFR model, or transport by both convection and diffusion as in the two PFR model, the story regarding the onset of blowout remains the same and is consistent with that given by CFD as well: the key to the stable operation of the reactor is the ignition event in the recirculation zone, resulting in the development of the radical pool. For pure hydrogen combustion as the fuel flow rate is reduced and the reactor moves towards blowout the destruction of the fuel slows and spreads, and the development of the radical pool moves further around the recirculation zone. The radical pool must develop (i.e. ignition must occur) before re-entrainment or the reactor will extinguish. For methane we similarly see the destruction of methane spread, and the net production of CO, and subsequently the net production of OH move further around the recirculation zone until the re-entrainment of radicals can no longer sustain the combustion. For methane, transport of the CO and radicals through turbulent diffusion appears to be a controlling process in this ignition event. The ignition event for hydrogen, on the other hand, is affected very little by the inclusion of diffusive transport of radicals. This is most likely due to the fact that the breakdown of hydrogen directly produces an H radical that feeds the chain propagating reaction, however the direct breakdown of methane has no such feedback. It is only in the destruction of methane intermediates that the H radical needed to feed the chain propagating reaction is produced. (Abstract shortened by UMI.).
Keywords/Search Tags:Fuel, Blowout, PFR model, Lean, Methane, CFD, Radical, JSR
Related items