Analogous uses of language, eucharistic identity, and the Baptist vision

I argue that attention to analogous uses of language, uses that constitute Eucharistic identity claims and James Wm. McClendon's articulation of the 'baptist' vision, shows there to be an intrinsic relation between the two, such that the 'baptist' vision and the identity claim of Jesus' body in the bread and in the church share an internal logic that is mutually illuminating of their real (i.e., not merely figural or symbolic) identity. Furthermore, it is the baptist vision itself that baptists ought fruitfully to offer as a constructive contribution to broadly catholic reflection on Eucharistic identity. After setting the context of my claim by a survey of recent Baptist engagements with broadly catholic tradition, I consider the work of Garth L. Hallett on identity claims, and David B. Burrell's work on analogous uses of language. I bring their insights to bear on the Eucharistic theology of Thomas Aquinas and the sixteenth Anabaptist theologian Balthasar Hubmaier, showing how attention to analogous uses of language provides constructive pathways to engage their claims. I then bring analogous uses of language in identity claims to bear on the baptist vision itself. There, I argue, that attention to analogous uses of language in McClendon's theology of the Lord's Supper in light of the narrative reading strategy of Scripture by baptists sheds light on Eucharistic identity and the baptist vision itself.