Adhesive interactions of biologically inspired soft condensed matter

Improving our fundamental understanding of the surface interactions between complex materials is needed to improve existing materials and products as well as develop new ones. The object of this research was to apply the measurements of fundamental surface interactions to real world problems facing chemical engineers and materials scientists. I focus on three systems of biologically inspired soft condensed matter, with an emphasis on the adhesive interactions between them.;The formation of phospholipid bilayers of the neutral lipid, dimyristoyl-phosphatidylcholine (DMPC) on silica surfaces from vesicles in aqueous solutions was investigated. The process involves five stages: vesicle adhesion to the substrate surfaces, steric interactions with neighboring vesicles, rupture, spreading via hydrophobic fusion of bilayer edges, and ejection of excess lipid, trapped water and ions into the solution. The forces between DMPC bilayers and silica were measured in the Surface Forces Apparatus (SFA) in phosphate buffered saline. The adhesion energy was found to be much stronger than the expected adhesion predicted by van der Waals interactions, likely due to an attractive electrostatic interaction.;The effects of non-adsorbing cationic polyelectrolytes on the interactions between supported cationic surfactant bilayers were studied using the SFA. Addition of polyelectrolyte has a number of effects on the interactions including the induction of a depletion-attraction and screening of the double-layer repulsion. Calculations are made that allow for the conversion of the adhesion energy measured in the SFA to the overall interaction energy between vesicles in solution, which determines the stability behavior of vesicle dispersions.;Mussels use a variety of dihydroxyphenyl-alanine (DOPA) rich proteins specifically tailored to adhering to wet surfaces. The SFA was used to study the role of DOPA on the adhesive properties of these proteins to TiO 2 and mica using both real mussel foot proteins (mfp) and a synthetic polypeptide analogue of mfp-3. Adhesion increased with DOPA concentration, although oxidation of DOPA reduces the adhesive capabilities of the proteins. Comparison of the two shows that DOPA is responsible for at least 80% of the adhesion energy of mfp-3 and can be attributed to DOPA groups favorably oriented within or at the interface of these films.