The Reflection Approach Of The Crisis Of Modernity Value And Its Horizon Integration

If we do not understand modernity as a concept in the "time" dimension,but instead consider modernity as the "concept" and "value" of human beings from traditional society to modern society,then we will find that the value concept system is The subject’s rationality and self-awareness were deconstructed,and a new value concept system was established.Since its establishment,western modernity has been a theoretical attempt by individuals to completely rely on their own "subject" and "self-awareness" to explain everything.The essence of modernity is the logic of rationality and the principle of subjectivity.After clarifying the nature of modernity,we find that the crisis of modernity between man and nature,man and society,and people can be attributed to the replacement of the "value subject" by "cognitive subject" with rational logic and self-awareness ".Therefore,responding to the crisis of modernity values requires reflection on how to save and create new value subjects.First,Marx’s method of reflection.Based on historical materialism,Marx not only criticized the rational logic of modernity,but also critically pointed out the realistic basis of rationality-capital.The combination of reason and capital constitutes the esse-nce of modernity.Based on the combination of capital and rational metaphysics,the logic of modernity is a kind of "abstract identity" logic.This kind of logic confuses "cognitive subject" and "value subject" on the one hand,and abstracts people "The abstract result is the loss of human value and meaning in life.Therefore,the final result of the crisis of modernity caused by the combination of rationality and capital is the loss of the "value subject",and Marx’s criticism of the crisis of modernity points to reason and capital.Specifically,Marx criticized capital on the theoretical support of capitalist social reality based on historical materialism(the realistic basis of rational metaphysics and capitalist production relations),thereby realizing the free and com-prehensive development of man and the new development of "value subject".Secondly,Heidegger’s method of reflection.Heidegger tried to transcend the "ontological" constraint of western rational logic and restore the "present" state and life value.Heidegger saw the influence of Western rationalist background on modern-ity for more than 2000 years,which can be reflected by the integration of rationality and technology to form "technical rationality" control.On the one hand,technical rationality establishes human "subjectivity".Relying on technical rationality,man has a greater ability to "force" nature in its relationship with nature.On the other hand,the "seat" of technology negates the "subjectivity" of human beings,and the fusion of technology and rationality keeps people away from the "natural" authenticity and "present" state.In addition,the meaning and value of life are negated,and people lose their "value subjectivity." Therefore,we must recognize the nature of technology and its positive significance for modernity,as well as its negative significance for mode-rnity.Technology causes "boringness" in time and negates the value of life.We need to jump out of everyday time,return to the real inner time,enrich the concrete connot-ation and value of life,obtain the meaning of existence,and then save the "value subject".However,Heidegger still stays in the logical framework of Western ration-alism and cannot truly transcend modernity.Third,,Liang Shuming’s reflection method.Liang Shuming reconsidered and criticized the crisis of modernity based on Confucian culture.Liang Shuming attached importance to cultural factors,reinterpreted and criticized modernity from a cultural perspective,and tried to overcome or even surpass modernity through a cultural reconstruction path of emotional and rational fusion.In Liang Shuming’s view,culture is a "lifestyle" and a home for survival.The cultural transformation of Western rationalism is the fundamental way to transcend modernity.Therefore,we need to find the cultural roots of the crisis of modernity value,and rediscover the secret of overcoming the crisis of modernity value from the source of Chinese civilization,pre-Qin Confucian culture,and improve countermeasures in the process.Reinterpret and construct modernity.Criticism of the crisis of modernity values.However,Liang Shuming’s grasp of Western society and modernity is relatively simple and superficial.He believes that certain "merits" of the Chinese spiritual level are a reflection of the progress of modern civilization.This is undoubtedly an exaggeration of traditional Chinese cultural values.Through the analysis of China,the West,and Marx,we find that,on the one hand,Heidegger and Liang Shuming’s reflection on the crisis of modernity value is worth learning from;on the other hand,Liang Shuming and Heidegger’s The opinion is unilateral:Heidegger’s critique of Western rationalism failed to escape the ideological framework of Western civilization,that is,Heidegger’s criticism of the crisis of modernity value could not escape modernity itself.Liang Shuming’s method of cultural reflection is based on a critique of the values of modernity proposed by traditional Chinese culture.Therefore,the theoretical basis and the realistic basis are the production relations and production methods of Chinese traditional civilization,and there is a tension with the current social reality.Therefore,we need to explore the reflection on the crisis of modernity in the fusion of Chinese and Western perspectives.Based on the new era of socialism with Chinese characteristics,to explore the construction of the contemporary Chinese value system,we must adhere to the Marxist value stand,and critically surpass Western rationalism on the basis of exploring the path of reflection on the crisis of modernity and socialism.Integrate values,promote the modernization and innovative development of Chinese traditional values,and create contemporary Chinese Marxist value theory.Therefore,the contemporary Chinese value system should be inclusive: the fusion of the three methods of China,the West,and Marx,the era: facing the past and the future,and humanity: focusing on the fate of the human community.