A Study On The Text Of Xin Tang Shu

After the Tang Dynasty,society became chaos.At this time,Liu xu and others wrote Tang Shu(??)on the basis of the original book.The book is poor quality.To Song Dynasty,scholars began to write a new Tang Shu,and they cunsulted Liu's book.The new book,improve the quality of the old.There is official background about Xin Tang Shu(???),so substituted of old Tang Shu,and spreaded.Xin Tang Shu has special writing principles,the principles named Chun Qiu Bi Fa(????),pay attention to sentence fining and Contains about criticism.Historical writing requirements real history in China,so conflict.There is no uniform rules for writing of Xin Tang Shu,so many contradictory produced.So people criticized.For example,Wu—Zhen Ye—Shi of Song Dynasty,Wang ruo—xu of Jin Dynasty,Hu ying—lin of Ming Dynasty,Wang ming—sheng Qian da—xin Zhao—Yi and others of Qing Dynasty,they wrote books or wrote thesises to discuss Xin Tang Shu.Besides,People in their writings Often involved Xin Tang Shu.They often study it from writing methods or historical research.In part one,the main study about previous research of Xin Tang Shu before Republic of China.Relate briefly how it happened,give a brief account of the study about Xin Tang Shu.So we can find law of historical writing in China and maturation process of Kao Ju Xue(???).There are four sections in part one.The first section,first gives a general overview of the study in Song and Yuan Dynasty,second,divide into four parts to reseach Lv Xia—qing Wu—Zhen Ye—Shi Wang Ruo—xu'study of Xin Tang Shu.We can find,the study about Xin Tang Shu is juvenility.The second section,first gives a general overview of the study in Ming Dynasty,we can find they like comment in Ming Dynasty and don't love to text.Second,divide into two parts to reseach Chen Shi—yuan Wang Shi—zhen Hu Ying—lin Zhu Ming—gao'study of Xin Tang Shu.We can find Hu Ying—lin'text is quite good.But it isn't system in Ming Dynasty.The third sect ion,first gives a general overview of the study in Qing Dynasty,second,divide into four parts to reseach Shen Bing—zhen Wang Ming—sheng Qian Da—xin Zhao—Yin'study of Xin Tang Shu.The fourth section,divide into four parts to reseach Zhao Shao—zu Li Ci—ming Tang Jing—chong Ding—Qian Wang Yue—zhen'study of Xin Tang Shu,Tang Jing—chong and Ding—Qian are in a part.We can find,Wang Yue—zhen'study about time of events in history and Ding—Qian's test about geography have made a penetrating analysis.Generally speaking,the study of Xin Tang Shu has their own history.It's juvenility in Song and Yuan Dynasty.In Ming Dynasty,people like study the law of writing about Xin Tang Shu,but not form system.In Qing Dynasty,people made a penetrating analysis and form their own system.It's best of all in Qing Dynasty.People revise many errors of Xin Tang Shu since it was writed out.Zhan Zong—you edited a book about achievement of Xin Tang Shu'text since The People's Republic of China was founded,and named The Text of Two Tang published by Shu Zhonghua Book(????????????),but before The People's Republic of China,the text of Xin Tang Shu wasn't collected.In part two,according content order of Xin Tang Shu,collected the text of Xin Tang Shu before Republic of China(Text during Republic of China will supple later.),and point out faults or add research of the text.The first to third section are text event,the fourth is errors of Xin Tang Shu's content.Through these,we can find the right and wrong of Xin Tang Shu's text before Republic of China.Besides,there are three appendixes.First,I find Cen Zhong—mian's text of Yang—Cheng that need add research,so we write a article about it.Through the article,we can find the wrong forming process in history book.Second,from the point of western historical theories,conside Kao Ju Xue(???)of China,analyze narrative and event in history.Tang Shu Zhi nBi(????)is very important for writing rules of Xin Tang Shu.It reflect the heart of Xin Tang Shu and the writing rules of history in our country.But the book hasn't edited.I based on Dian Ben(????),consulted Zhe Ben(??????),form a fine copy.