Font Size: a A A

Resistant Breakpoint And Mechanism Study For Haemophilus Parasuis Against Tildipirosin

Posted on:2019-01-07Degree:DoctorType:Dissertation
Country:ChinaCandidate:Z X LeiFull Text:PDF
GTID:1360330572982865Subject:Basic veterinary science
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Pasteurella multocida?PM?is a widespread pathogenic bacterium that can cause mucosal surfaces and respiratory tract infection in animals and results in the large economic losses in the livestock and poultry industry.The Haemophilus parasuis?HPS?bacterium is a common inhabitant of the upper respiratory tract in pigs,and infection is characterized by arthritis,meningitis and polyserositis.Tildipirosin,a new 16-membered ring macrolide antimicrobial,has been widely recommended for the treatment of the respiratory diseases infected by Haemophilus parasuis,Pasteurella multocida,Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae and Mannheimia haemolytica in pigs and bovines.Due to the irrational use of antibiotics,the resistant development of bacteria is more and more serious.Therefore,it is essential for veterinarians to use antibiotics wisely and establish an optimal dosage in the veterinary clinic and provide a criterion for resistance for tildipirosin.Additionally,it is also necessary to investigate the resistant mechanism of bacteria such as Haemophilus parasuis,Pasteurella multocida et al to prevent the increasing development of bacterial resistance.In the current study,the MIC values of clinical isolates Pasteurella multocida?112?and Haemophilus parasuis?164?were measured using agar dilution methods based on CLSI guidelines.The ECV for tildipirosin against Pasteurella multocida and Haemophilus parasuis was determined by the freeware statistical program“ECOFFinder”which could estimate the wild-type population and derive the ECV value.According to the PK-PD integration modeling,dose estimation equations and Monte Carlo,the PK-PD cutoff and updated optimal dosages were defined.Additionally,JS0135 with a MIC value?0.125?g/mL?was induced to achieve the resistant Haemophilus parasuis?JS50,MIC=32?g/mL?under antibiotic?tildipirosin?pressure.The transcriptional profiling was applied to analyze the variation in gene expression of JS0135 and tildipirosin-resistant JS50 for the resistant mechanism.The cell membranes of JS50 and HB32 were also compared to JS0135 with the transmission electron microscope.The up-regulated genes derived from JS50 were selected for genes deletions.The geometric bacteria were obtained with homologous arm recombination technique.The geometric bacteria were compared to the JS0135?the original one?to test the differences including MIC and growth curves and so on.Finally,the resistant mechanism was explored at the gene levels.1.The optimal schemes and resistant cut-off values for tildipirosin against Haemophilus parasuis164 clinical Haemophilus parasuis isolated from Hunan,Hubei,Anhui,Shandong and so on during 2013-2016.These isolates have been identified to be positive.The minimum inhibitory concentrations?MIC?of 164 HPS isolates were determined and the MIC50 and MIC90 were calculated as 0.25 and 2?g/mL.High-Level MIC value for HB32?256?g/mL?was obtained in this study.The cumulative counts for MIC data,with the exception of one resistant strain with a MIC of 256?g/mL,were performed to match a suitably shaped normal distribution?normality test,P>0.200?using SigmaStat and GraphPad Prism software.The optimum MIC range from 0.002 to 32?g/mL was obtained from the non-linear regression,and the range was further corrected to 0.032 to32?g/mL according to the optimum distribution determined using the NORMINV function in Microsoft Excel.The probability of a MIC at 8?g/mL was 97.9%,which encompassed 95%of the WT isolates,defined as the ECV using the NORMDIST function in Microsoft Excel.Furthermore,the ECV was performed using ECOFFinder software,and the ECV was also defined to be 8?g/mL which was similar to the result determined by the NORMDIST function.The strong virulent strain SH0165 whose MIC?2?g/mL?was similar to the MIC90was selected for PD analysis in vitro and ex vivo including growth-time and killing-time curves.The time-killing curve of tildipirosin against SH0165 demonstrated that lower concentrations??2 MIC?showed similar antimicrobial activity for HPS.The bacteriostatic efficiency gradually strengthened with increasing tildipirosin concentrations,when tildipirosin concentrations were higher than 2 MIC.According to the characteristics of the killing-time curve in vitro,the activity of tildipirosin against HPS was identified as being concentration-dependent.14 healthy pigs?of both sexes?weighing 25-30 kg and 8 weeks,were carried out for this research work.2 among of these 14 pigs were performed for preliminary experiment and HPLC method validations.The lower limit of quantification?LOQ?and determination?LOD?values of tildipirosin were 0.025 and 0.0125?g/mL in the plasma and BAL samples.The accuracy,precision,recovery and stability tests met the requirements for quantitative determination in biological samples.12 healthy pigs were divided into 2 groups?A and B?randomly.A group was performed for PK in the plasma,and B group was performed for PK study in BAL.The plasma and BAL samples were collected from 0 to 10 and 0 to 17 days,respectively.The PK parameters of tildipirosin in plasma and BAL were calculated using WinNolin software.The results for the area under the curve within 24 h(AUC24h),the area under the curve?AUC?,peak concentration(Cmax),relative total systemic clearance?CLb?in the plasma and BAL were 4.25?g*h/mL,14.16?g*h/mL,1.01?g/ml,0.283 L/h*kg and 83.13?g*h/mL,855.46?g*h/mL,4.06?g/ml,0.005 L/h*kg.Significant differences in Clb,Cmax,AUC,AUC24h?p?0.01?were observed in plasma and BAL.Both pharmacokinetic parameters in BAL were higher than those in plasma apparently.According to previous studies,intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic examination had been performed by collecting the BAL from larger mammals using a sterilized catheter.Lung tissue was not the bio-phase for lung infected pathogens,and it had been accepted widely.HPS similar to Pasteurella multocida was strictly extracellular pathogens,and the BAL was its main location for these extracellular pathogens.Although the drug concentration in BAL exceeded many times than that in plasma,it could be unable to maintain an effective local extracellular concentration in PLEF because of its extremely slow dynamic and release of drug in vivo.Moreover,the clinical relevance of BAL?the total tildipirosin concentrations?was only well understood by those working in the marketing department of a drug company but not by physio-pathologists.At the same time,the high BAL drug concentration was caused by the lysis of cells?including high drug concentrations?during the broncho-alveolar lavage procedure when it was required to collect BAL.Therefore,it was recommended to select PK data in plasma to study the PK/PD cutoff(COPD)for macrolides.The relationship between antimicrobial efficacy and the ex vivo PK/PD parameter of AUC24h/MIC ratios were simulated by using the inhibitory sigmoid Emax model.The PK/PD targets(AUC24h/MIC)for COPD analysis was 52.27 h when it appeared bactericidal activity?E=-3?.Using the ex vivo PD and PK data determined from plasma,10,000 Monte Carlo simulations were run using Crystal Ball software.The cumulative PTA was determined for target“52.27h”(AUC24h/MIC)at different WT MICs in 50%serum of pigs.The PTA was only 0.12%at a value of 0.125?g/mL but reached 96.54%when the MIC value was 0.0625?g/mL.Consequently,a PTA?90%could be obtained for isolates with MIC?0.0625?g/mL in pig serum?50%?after i.m.administration at a dose of 4 mg/kg body weight.According to the ratio of MIC in vitro to ex vivo?8 times?,the COPD for tildipirosin against HPS was 0.5?g/mL determined in vitro?TSB?.Based on the CLSI guidance,the final resistant cut-off value was 8?g/mL.Based on the dose equations and Monte Carlo modeling analysis,the predicted doses for bacteriostatic,bactericidal and elimination activities of tildipirosin against HPS over 24 h were 2.07,4.17 and 5.78 mg/kg.bw for 90%target,respectively.The results of this study offer a more optimized alternative for clinical use and demonstrated that 4.17 mg/kg of tildipirosin by intramuscular injection could have an effect on bactericidal activity against Haemophilus parasuis.According to the methods deduced from the resistant breakpoint and optimal dosage for tildipirosin against HPS,the final resistant cut-off value was defined as 4?g/mL,and the predicted doses for bacteriostatic,bactericidal and elimination activity of tildipirosin against PM over 24 h were 4.12,6.35 and 7.64 mg/kg.bw for 90%target,respectively.The predicted daily dosage over 24 h?6.35 mg/kg?might be more sufficient and effective.However,these values are of great significance for the effective treatment of HPS and PM infections,but it also is deserved to be validated in clinical practice in the future research.2.Comparative transcriptional profiling of tildipirosin-resistant and sensitive Haemophilus parasuisNumerous studies have been conducted to examine the molecular mechanism of Haemophilus parasuis resistance to antibiotics,but rarely to tildipirosin.In the current study,transcriptional profiling was applied to analyze the variation in gene expression of JS0135 and tildipirosin-resistant JS50.The growth curves showed that JS50 had a higher growth rate but fewer bacteria than JS0135.The cell membranes of JS50 and a resistant clinical isolate?HB32?were observed to be smoother than those of JS0135.From the comparative gene expression profile 349 up-and 113 downregulated genes were observed,covering 37 GO and 63 KEGG pathways which are involved in biological processes?11?,cellular components?17?,molecular function?9?,cellular processes?1?,environmental information processing?4?,genetic information processing?9?and metabolism?49?affected in JS50.In addition,the relative overexpression of genes of the metabolism pathway?HAPSRS09315,HAPSRS09320?,ribosomes?HAPSRS07815?and ABC transporters?HAPSRS10945?was detected,particularly the metabolism pathway,and verified with RT-qPCR.Collectively,the gene expression profile in connection with tildipirosin resistance factors revealed unique and highly resistant determinants of HPS to macrolides that warrant further attention due to the significant threat of bacterial resistance.3.The resistance effect to tildipirosin induced by HAPSRS03625,HAPSRS05545,HAPSRS05435HAPSRS03625,HAPSRS05545,HAPSRS05435 encoding the ABC transporters permeases in HPS could play the roles in resistance to antibiotics.In this study,7 genes were selected to conduct for resistance mechanism using gene knockout techniques.Based on the principle of homologous genes crossing over,their genes including JS0135?03625,JS0135?5545,JS0135?5435 were obtained successfully.According to the growth-curves of mutant strains?JS0135?03625,JS0135?5545,JS0135?5435?and wild-type strain?JS0135?,there was no significant difference.This result revealed that the deletion of such three genes would not cause damage to bacterial growth activities.The MIC detections results demonstrated that there were 2-4 times downtrends for mutant strains compared to wild-type strain against tildipirosin.However,the MICs appear to be recuperative after 48 h.The cell membrane of JS50 was observed to be smoother than those of JS0135 and JS0135?5545,the membrane of JS0135?5545 was rougher than JS0135,but no any significant difference between JS0135 and JS0135?5545 based on transmission electron microscopy analysis.These results demonstrated that the resistant mechanism of HPS to tildipirosin could be relative to ABC transporters permeases.The genes of HAPSRS03625,HAPSRS05545,HAPSRS05435 might play important roles in the resistant mechanism.Due to the complicacy for the resistant mechanism,the resistance could be regulated by various genes,thus the predicted resistant genes should be validated in the future study.These results could provide novel insights and show the new therapeutic targets for reducing the resistant development for HPS.
Keywords/Search Tags:Tildipirosin, Haemophilus parasuis, Pasteurella multocida, Resistance breakpoint, RNA-Seq, Gene deletion, Resistance mechanism
PDF Full Text Request
Related items