Study On Local Government’s Discourse On Precaution Of Mass Incidents Triggered By Land Expropriation

With the advancement of urbanization,mass incidents are appeared increasingly in the process of land expropriation,with the face of mass incidents triggered by land expropriation frequently,the government’s preparedness and alert are particularly important.Scholars at home and abroad,who have presented the output of discussion regarding the local government’s actions toward mass requisition of land and conflict.However,there are currently no researchers studying on local government’ s discourse on prevention about mass requisition of land and conflict.Local government has put what’s discourse in the process of prevention on mass requisition of land and conflict,those discourse are how to produce and spread,people are willing or unwilling to receive those discourse,whether the effectiveness of discourse are effect prevention,which are worth studying.For studying deeply the local government’s discourse on prevention of mass incidents triggered by land expropriation,this paper uses Norman Fairclough’s discourse analysis framework,carrying out the studying from three dimensions,which includes the discourse of text,practice and society.Using the combination of qualitative and quantitative method,focus on local government’s discourse production,spreading,reception and evaluation about mass incidents triggered by land expropriation.In order to support theoretical basis and practice reference for the work of local government’s discourse on prevention of mass incidents triggered by land expropriation.This paper has divided into nine chapters.The first chapter is introduction.The second chapter is research basis.The third chapter is description of research text.The fourth chapter is local government’s actions toward discourse produce on prevention about mass requisition of land and conflict.The fifth chapter is local government’s actions toward discourse spread on prevention about mass requisition of land and conflict.The sixth chapter is the local government’s actions toward discourse receive on prevention of mass requisition of land and conflict.The seventh chapter is the local government’s actions toward discourse evaluate on prevention about mass requisition of land and conflict.The eighth chapter is local government’s actions toward discourse promote on prevention about mass requisition of land and conflict.The ninth chapter is the conclusion and prospect of this research.Through the above research,this paper get the main following conclusions:Conclusion of discourse production:The essence of local government’s actions toward discourse production on prevention of mass requisition of land and conflict,which are the embodiment of interactive relations among government,media and public.Government leading,media promotion and public participation,which are the features of local government’s actions toward on prevention about mass requisition of land and conflict.Driving force of major events,mass media,political experts,and public opinion environment,which has constituted the power local government’s actions toward discourse production on mass requisition of land and conflict.Policy text is the main form of discourse generated.Conclusion of discourse spread:Local government’s discourse spread style on prevention about mass requisition of land and conflict,which including concentration spread,dispersion and mixing spread.Local government’s actions toward discourse spreading on prevention about mass requisition of land and conflict,which is included discourse content,spread subject,spread carrier,spread path and spread function.Local government’s discourse spread level on prevention about mass requisition of land and conflict,comprehensive evaluation level are satisfaction and general.Level of satisfaction in the comprehensive evaluation that means local government’s discourse spread properly on prevention about mass requisition of land and conflict,the work of discourse spread well,discourse spread on prevention about mass requisition of land and conflict do well.Level of general in the comprehensive evaluation shows that local government’s discourse spread on prevention about mass requisition of land and conflict do not well,discourse spread on prevention about mass requisition of land and conflict needs to improve significantly.Conclusion of discourse reception:Computers,mobile phones,TV,radio and newspaper,which are the local government’s discourse receiving mode on prevention about mass requisition of land and conflict.Local government’s discourse receive willingness are high on prevention about mass requisition of land and conflict.Age and discourse receive willingness are positive correlation,under the 1%level significance,age change for each level,discourse receive willingness,which will rise by 4.06%.Account status and discourse receive willingness are negative correlation,under the 1%level significance,account status change for each level,discourse receiving willingness,which will down by 27.95%.Level of education and discourse receive willingness are positive correlation,under the 5%level significance,level of education change for each level,discourse receiving willingness,which will rise by 5.77%.Political status and discourse receive willingness are positive correlation,under the 10%level significance,political status change for each level,discourse receiving willingness,which will rise by 1.07%.Monthly income and discourse receive willingness are negative correlation,under the 1%level significance,monthly income change for each level,discourse receiving willingness,which will down by 11.15%.Conclusion of discourse evaluation:Local government’s discourse production effectiveness on prevention about mass requisition of land and conflict and prevention effect are positive correlation,under the 5%level significantly.Discourse spread effectiveness and prevention effect are positive correlation,under the 1%level significantly.Discourse reception effectiveness and prevention effect are positive correlation,under the 1%level significantly.Preventive effect and government credibility are positive correlation,under the 1%level significantly.Preventive effect and government image,it is not pass the significance test.Government credibility and government image are positive correlation,under the 1%level significantly.Discourse promotion countermeasure:First,improving the discourse produce environment,which including attaches great importance on the text of scientific nature,clear to prevent content and implement the information disclosure.Secondly,optimizing the discourse spread mechanism,which including pay attention to the access to information,establishing the diffusion evaluation mechanism and reasonable rewards system.Thirdly,building discourse receiving atmosphere,which including effective information dissemination,democratic platform’s building and clear text logic.