| Part â… :Isolation of CD105+SMSCs and evaluation of chondrogenic capacity of CD105+SMSCsObjective:To compare chondrogenic capacity of CD105+SMSCs and CD105"SMSCsMethods:SMSCs were divided into two groups:CD105-SMSCs and CD105+SMSCs. CD105SMSCs were enriched by Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). The proliferation of cells in both groups was detected by WST-1assay at day3,7and14after seeding. Immunohistochemistry was prepared to investigate the expression of type â…¡ collagen of both groups at day14. The expression of type â…¡ collagen, aggrecan, and sox9mRNA of both groups was tested by RT-qPCR in both groups at day14.Results:Morphology of cells in both groups showed spindle-shape or stellate-shape. Results of immunofluorescence showed more positive expression in CD105+SMSCs group. The results(od value) of WST-1assay in CD105SMSCs and CD105+SMSCs were0.329±0.0120VS0.376±0.012at day3,0.524±0.017VS0.581±0.019at day7,0.658±0.032VS0.702±0.099at day14, P<0.05at each day with a statistical significance. Expression of type II collagen of cellular matrix was stronger in CD105+SMSCs group than in CD105"SMSCs. The results of RT-qPCR(2-△△CT) in CD105-SMSCs and CD105+SMSCs were1VS2.937±0.899(col â…¡),1VS10.676±2.276(sox9)ã€1VS4.282±0.463(aggrecan), P<0.05with a statistical significance.Conclusion:The process of enriching CD105+SMSCs by using FACS showed no obvious adverse effects on chondrogenic capacity of CD105+SMSCs. Compared with CD105"SMSCs, CD105+SMSCs were stronger in chondrogenic capacity. Part â…¡:Experimental research of the value of CD105-ABBS on capturing SMSCsObjective:Evaluation of the value of CD105monoclonal antibody-biotin-avidin binding system on capturing CD105+SMSCs and its influence on chondrogenic capacity of SMSCsMethods:ABBS and CD105-ABBS were prepared on cell slides respectively. Slides were transferred into a same culture dish which contained SMSCs suspension. and then the culture dish were put into a cell incubator. Thirty minutes later, slides were taken out of the culture dish, and vibrated for a while to wash away unattached cells. The differences of the number of attached cells were comparied, so as proportion of CD105+SMSCs. Immunohistochemistry was prepared to investigate the expression of type â…¡ collagen in both groups. The expression of type â…¡ collagen, aggrecan, sox9mRNA of both groups was tested by RT-qPCR at day14.Results:The number of attached cells in ABBS and CD105-ABBS was20.33±5.43VS40.67±7.54, P<0.05with a statistical significance. Proportion of CD105+SMSCs of attached cells in ABBS and CD105-ABBS groups was (47.67±7)%VS (72.33±11.93)%, P<0.05with a statistical significance. Expression of type â…¡ collagen of cellular matrix was stronger in CD105-ABBS group than in ABBS group. The results of RT-qPCR(2-△△CT) in ABBS and CD105-ABBS were1VS1.835±0.369(col â…¡).1VS2.808â’ˆ0.189(sox9)ã€1VS3.146â’ˆ0.552(aggrecan), P<0.05with a statistical significance.Conclusion:CD105-monoclonal antibody-biotin-avidin binding system can be used to capture CD105+SMSCs, which provides efficient method for situ regeneration in vivo and tissue engineering construction in vitro. |