Clinical Study On The Treatment Of Yin Deficiency And Internal Heat Insomnia With Lily Zhimu Soup And Flavor Formula

Objective: By observing the efficacy of Lily Zhimu decoction plus flavor formula in the treatment of yin deficiency and internal heat insomnia,the effectiveness of lily zhimu decoction in the treatment of hypothermic internal disturbance insomnia was evaluated,which provided clinical evidence for the clinical treatment of insomnia.Methods: A total of 60 patients with sleeplessness who met the enrollment criteria were collected and randomly divided into control group(n=30)and treatment group(n=30).The control group patients were treated with oral zopiclone tablets,and the treatment group patients were treated with Lily Zhiplone Tong and flavor formula on top of the treatment regimen of oral zopiclone tablets(for a total of 4 weeks).The scores of the TCM Syndrome Score Scale,Athens Insomnia Scale(AIS)and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Scale(PSQI)before and after treatment were observed and analyzed between the two groups,and the score changes and the difference in points between the two groups were compared,and the statistical analysis software SPSS22.0 was used for analysisConclusion: Clinical efficacy of insomnia: 1.Compared between the two groups,the effective rate of the treatment group was 96.66%,and the effective rate of the control group was 83.33%,and the treatment group was significantly better than the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(p<0.01).2.Compared between the points of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Scale,the effective rate of the treatment group was 96.66%,the effective rate of the control group was 93.33%,the use of zopiclone tablets alone could improve the symptoms of insomnia,and the combination of Lily Zhimu Tong plus subtraction had better efficacy in the treatment of insomnia,and the treatment group was better than the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.01).3.Compared with the points of TCM syndrome scale,the effective rate of the treatment group was 96.66%,and the effective rate of the control group was 76.66%,and the treatment group was better than the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(p<0.01).Safety analysis: There were no obvious adverse reactions in both groups during the treatment,and the safety was good.