| Purpose:This article aims to observe the clinical efficacy and advantages of mild infantile influenza(heat toxin attacking the lungs).Methods:103 children who met the inclusion criteria were treated in the Pediatric Outpatient Clinic of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine as the research objects,and were randomly divided into a test group of 51 cases and a control group of 52 cases.The test group was treated with Flu No.1 prescription,Oral administration 3 times a day,the control group was treated with oseltamivir phosphate granules,oral administration 2 times a day.The drug doses of the two groups changed with the age of the children,and the course of treatment was 5 days.The scores of symptoms and signs of the two groups of children were observed before and after treatment,and the statistical software SPSS25.0 was used to compare the changes of the scores and evaluate the curative effect.Results:1.General situation analysis:This study collected a total of 103 cases that met the inclusion criteria.Among them,because the children and their family members were unable to adhere to treatment or suffered from other diseases,1 case and 2 cases were dropped from the test group and the control group.The final statistics were two cases.50 cases in each group.The two groups had no statistical difference in gender,age,and scores of symptoms before treatment(P>0.05),and they were comparable.2.Intra-group comparison after treatment:the comparison of the total symptom score and body temperature effect of the two groups on the first 1/3/5th day of treatment showed improvement,indicating that the two groups’methods for treating mild infantile influenza(heat-to-lung type)were both improved.There is curative effect,comparison between groups:the score and curative effect improvement of the test group are better than those of the control group,and the difference is statistically significant(P<0.05).3.Comparison of total curative effect:The clinical cure rate and total effective rate of the test group are higher than those of the control group,and the difference is statistically significant(P<0.05).4.Comparison of the antipyretic efficacy of the two groups.The antipyretic onset time of the experimental group and the control group were 15.98±4.92h and 23.36±7.46h,and the complete antipyretic time was 22.38±5.37h and 36.14±9.71h,respectively.The antipyretic rate in the 24h and 48h group was higher than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusions:1.Influenza No.1 prescription can effectively improve the symptoms and signs of children with mild influenza(heat toxin attacking the lungs),and the effect is significant.2.Influenza No.1 prescription has better antipyretic effect and symptom improvement than oseltamivir phosphate particles in the treatment of mild influenza(heat toxin lung type)in children,and it is safer and more reliable. |