Study On The Effect Of Mobile Platform With On-site Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training Among Grid Staff

Objective145 community grid staffs were trained with two different cardiopulmonary resuscitation(CPR)training methods,to evaluate which training method is more effective and more suitable for the public,and to optimize the current traditional CPR training forms.Methods145 community grid members from Shenzhen Baoan District were selected,they all never received CPR training before.The selected community grid members were divided into two groups randomly,73 members in the experimental group and 72 members in the control group.Members in both groups received CPR questionnaire survey before and after training.The experimental group members received mobile platform self-learning and simulated-human operation training method,while the control group members received traditional face-to-face teaching and simulated-human operation training method.Cardiopulmonary resuscitation simulator assessment was used to compare the training effects between the two groups.After half a year,the reassessment will be conducted.Retraining was performed follow the reassessment.The Cardiopulmonary resuscitation simulator assessment was performed again,to compare the advantages and disadvantages of the two groups in terms of the fluency of the CPR process and rescue efficiency.The main evaluation indicators are following:Assessing the scene environment,judging the patient's awareness,posturing correctly,checking pulse and breathing,calling 120,adequate of chest compression depth,adequate of chest compression rate,opening the airway correctly,compression and ventilation ratio,ventilation quality.Result1.According to the questionnaire survey,no matter what type of CPR training the grid staffs received,the first aid knowledge and awareness has greatly improved after the CPR training.The following aspects are statistically significant:willing to help strangers(p<0.001),correct judgement of cardiac arrest(p<0.001),correctly managing patients with cardiac arrest at home(p<0.001),correctly managing patients with cardiac arrest at outside(p<0.001),there is no statistical difference before and after training when speaking out the emergency phone correctly(p=0.123).2.There is no statistical difference in CPR test scores between the experimental group and the control group(80.34±7.26 vs 82.49±6.25,p=0.059)in the training for the first time.3.Half a year later,the CPR test scores of the experimental group(80.34±7.26 vs 61.84±7.22)and the control group(82.49±6.25 vs 59.64±6.87)were both lower than that of half a year ago,and the difference is statistically significant(P<0.001).4.After the retraining,the CPR test scores of the experimental group(80.34±7.26 vs 84.03 ±7.26,P=0.003)and the control group(82.49±6.25 vs 85.02± 6.67,P=0.023)were both improved compared with half a year ago.5.After the retraining,the CPR test scores of the experimental group and the control group are still not statistically different(84.03±7.26 vs 85.02±6.67,P=0.413).ConclusionCompared with the traditional cardiopulmonary resuscitation training and the mobile platform self-learning training,there are no significant difference between two methods.