| Objective:To explore the cooperation of different levels and hot spots of domestic and international diabetes research papers,we make a comparative analysis from big data perspectives,so as to provide researchers with the reference.Methods:The data of diabetes mellitus was retrieved in databases of China National Knowledge Infrastructure,Wanfang Data and Web of Science,using the scientometrics statistics,and social network analysis for data mining.Results:1.The number of domestic diabetes research papers published increased gradually in the field;There are many stable "small groups" in author cooperation network and the high-yield "core authors" have formed;High-yield authors,institutions,regions were of great importance in the cooperation,which have obvious regional characteristics and concentrated in large cities;High frequency keywords can be divided into six different clusters and the principle of "three-level-prevention" is being paid more and more attention.2.The number of international diabetes research papers published is increasing exponentially;The group of "core authors" with high yield has also been formed,and the differentiation of author cooperative teams is obvious;The degree distribution of institution cooperative network nodes conforms to the power law distribution,and The cohesion of institutional network is becoming higher and higher;Core institutions and States play a prominent role in cooperation;The situation of scientific research cooperation varies from continent to continent;Hot spots can reflect that researchers are increasingly aware of the importance of diabetes prevention.Conclusion:1.With the increasing number of papers published,the research on diabetes is booming.2.The Chinese scientific research cooperation network is not mature,and the depth and breadth are low.3.The mode of scientific research cooperation is single,and the phenomenon of small groups of authors in China is obvious.4.Cooperative networks have the characteristics of small worlds,which are even more evident in English cooperation networks.5.The distribution of scientific research cooperation is uneven,and the core forces play a significant role,and the Matthew effect is obvious.6.Scientific cooperation is strongly influenced by geographical and political factors.7.The output and cooperation of the papers are greatly affected by the economy.8.the principle of "three-level-prevention" is being paid more and more attention. |