| ObjectiveThrough the observation of treating heart-kidney incoordination insomnia by K11 moxibustion with the Guqin music is not handed in clinical therapeutic effect of insomnia patients. Preliminary study on the K11 moxibustion with Guqin music method on treatment of heart-kidney incoordination type of insomnia, curative effect and whether it has the advantage, and the advantages of its efficacy in clinical use has revealed.MethodsWill comply with the conditions of 64 cases of insomnia were randomly divided into treatment group and control group, K11 moxibustion with Guqin music group and routine acupuncture group,32 cases in each, weekly treatment 3 times,4 weeks of treatment (12 times). Efficacy was evaluated by observing the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) score and the clinical efficacy of insomnia.Results(1) The statistical analysis with the K11 moxibustion with guqin music group and routine acupuncture group before treatment in gender, age, Pittsburgh sleep quality index and the total score of had no significant difference (P> 0.05). The components of PSQI assessment, the two groups before and after treatment were statistically significant (P>0.01). The PSQI data results showed that the two groups of patients after treatment, treatment group than in the control group the score are decreased, and the in sleep latency and sleep efficiency both difference has statistical significance (P<0.05); and sleep quality, sleep duration and Pittsburgh sleep quality score before and after the treatment with the control group, the difference of no statistical significance (P>0.05). It is indicated that the treatment group and the control Ju can improve insomnia patients with subjective sleep quality, sleep time, sleep time, sleep efficiency, sleep disorders, hypnotic drugs and daytime dysfunction, while the treatment group in improving patients with insomnia sleep time and sleep efficiency is better than that of control according to group.(2) After treatment, the clinical efficacy of the two groups showed that the total effective rate of the treatment group was 93.75ï¼…, the control group total effective rate was 87.10ï¼…, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). But the clinical cure rate, effective rate and total effective rate of the treatment group were higher than that of the control group, the treatment group was better than the control group.ConclusionClinical study showed that the two groups of patients after treatment, sleep improvement, and the treatment group of clinical cure rate, significant efficiency and total effective rate were better than the control group. Overall, although the overall efficacy of the two groups was equivalent, but the treatment group was better than the control group. |
PDF Full Text Request