The Clinical Comparative Study Of Endoscope Thyroidectomy Via Areola Breast Approach And Traditional Open Thyroidectomy

Objective:To explore the cosmetic advantage、safety and minimal invasion of endoscope thyroidectomy via areola breast approachMethod:Retrospectively analyzed the clinical datas of116patients From Feb2011to Feb2013. there are116cases were implemented thyroidectomy.84cases were underwent endoscope thyroidectomy and38cases were underwent traditional opening thyroid—ectomy. Comparing the time、blood Ioss、incision score of beauty, the time of after surgery hospitalization, the cost of hospitalization and surgical complications between the two surgical operationResult:The surgery was performed successfully in all patients of the two groups Compared with open group, endoscope group had less blood loss, higher satisfaction cosmetic incision. without scars and skin color change after anterior surgery, but the surgery had a little longer surgery time, the higher cost of hospitalization. there was1case of endoscope group occurred bleeding0cases of open group;3cases of endoscope group occurred hoarseness2cases of open group;1case of endoscope group occurred fluid in surgical incision3cases of open group; Follow up2to30months. no low blood calcium and other complicationsConclusion:Comparing with traditional open thyroid surgery, endoscope thyroidectomy get the desired effect of cosmetic surgery safety, quick recovery1with the incomparable advantages of traditional opening thyroid surgery. is the ideal method of operation of benign thyroid disease. is worthy of clinical use...