| Subject for researchThe clinical observation of comprehensive treatment on treating chronic pelvic inflammatory disease . The objective of researchUse comprehensive treatment to treat hot and damp stasis pelvic inflammatory and to observe the clinical effect on comprehensive treatment treating chronic pelvic inflammatory disease ,and provide scientific basis for comprehensive treatment's appliciation in clinic. The design of research60 cases of chronic pelvic inflammatory disease were divided into two groups randomly; comprehensive treatment group and western medicine menstrual period anti- inflammation control group, each group of 30 examples. Through observation comprehensive treatment result appraisal clinical curative effect. Observation indexexThe changes of the symptom , tongue , pulse; The gynaecology checks: Including the pelvis is checked and vulva inspection; Belly type ultrasonic wave is checked: Uterus, enclosure. Treatment and Observation MethodsTreatment group: Takes orally the traditional Chinese medicine and the external application of traditional Chinese medicine and traditional Chinese medicine keeps enema.Stop using in menstrual period, it is a course of treatment every month, 3 courses of treatment observe curative effect to use medicineControl group: Resist inflammation in menstrual period, once a day , it is a course of treatment in three days to begin to use together in each menstrual cycle, the antibiotic uses medicine 3 courses of treatment observe curative effect. Statistics methodMeasuring the materials adopts t to examine, count materials adopt X2 examine , grade materials analyse with Ridit. Result1 .Treat group treat damp and hot silt person who hinder chronic pelvic infecton show 73.33% rate , clinical efficient 90.00% always; Contrast group show 43.33% rate , clinical efficient 63.33% always. Analysed by statistics, two groups relatively have a significance difference P < 0.05, state and treat group's curative effect and is superior to contrasting the group.2.Two Chinese medicine card comparison of curative effect Hou , patient of group ? treat group show 76.67% rate , clinical efficient 93.33% always; Contrast group show 40.00% rate , clinical efficient 60.00% always. Analysed by statistics, two groups relatively have a significance difference P<0.05 , state and treat group's curative effect and is superior to contrasting the group. |