Objective:verifying clinical effects of the traditional Chinese medicine on pelvic cavity inflammation (kidney deficiency and blood stasis syndromes) treatment, comparing curative effect difference between duplex therapy and triple therapy on clinic, further optimizing the pelvic cavity inflammation treatment scheme, forming Chinese medical diagnosis and therapy specifications and guidelines of the disease, providing a more effective method and screening a more effective prescription for the therapy of the pelvic cavity inflammation.Methods:strictly selecting 219 cases of patients in accordance with the diagnostic criteria of the pelvic cavity inflammation (kidney deficiency and blood stasis syndromes) as research objects for clinical research according to the inclusion criteria and the exclusion criteria. The duplex therapy group accounts for 112 cases, the triple therapy groupâ… accounts for 67 cases, and the triple therapy groupâ…¡accounts for 40 cases. The duplex therapy group is treated by oral administration and rectal administration of the traditional Chinese medicine, the triple therapy groupâ… is treated by oral administration, rectal administration and encapsulated external application of the traditional Chinese medicine, and the triple therapy groupâ…¡is treated by oral administration, rectal administration and ion import therapy of the traditional Chinese medicine. The oral administration of the traditional Chinese medicine is not stopped during the menstrual period and continuously adopted for 2 months; the rectal administration, the encapsulated external application and the ion import of the traditional Chinese medicine take 14 days as one course, and are stopped during the menstrual period and continuously adopted for 2 courses. The clinical effects are evaluated by statistical analysis of data of Chinese medicinal syndrome integral, local physical sign integral and so on before and after the therapy of each group.Results:(1) By comparing the three groups for treating pelvic cavity pain, the healing rate of the duplex group is 66.1 percent, the healing rate of the triple groupâ… is 67.2 percent, and the healing rate of the triple groupâ…¡is 47.5 percent. By non-parametric tests, P=0.002(<0.05), the difference has statistical significance. In further compares, P=0.039,0.045 (<0.05),betwee the duplex group and the triple groupâ…¡, the triple groupâ… and the triple groupâ…¡, the difference has statistical significance.(2) By comparing the three groups for eliminating pelvic cavity masses, the healing rate of the duplex group is 86.6percent, the healing rate of the triple group I is 77.6 percent, and the healing rate of the triple groupâ…¡is 62.5 percent. By non-parametric tests,P=0.000(<0.05), the difference has statistical significance. In further compares, P=0.001(<0.05),betwee the duplex group and the triple groupâ…¡, the difference has statistical significance.(3) By comparing the three groups of local physical signs, the healing rate of the duplex group is 64.3 percent, the healing rate of the triple groupâ… is 70.0 percent, and the healing rate of the triple groupâ…¡is 45.0 percent. By non-parametric tests, P=0.029 (<0.05), the difference has statistical significance. In further compares, P=0.033,0.010(<0.05), betwee the duplex group and the triple groupâ…¡, the difference has statistical significance.(4) By comparing the three groups of therapy of Chinese medical syndromes, the healing rate of the duplex group is 68.8 percent, the healing rate of the triple groupâ… is 70.1 percent, and the healing rate of the triple groupâ…¡is 55.0 percent. By non-parametric tests, P=0.219(>0.05), the difference has no statistical significance.(5) By comparing three groups of Chinese medical primary symptom recovery rates, the difference (P<0.05) on hypogastralgia or lumbosacral swelling pain and leukorrhagia symptoms has statistical significance. In further compares, (P< 0.05),betwee the duplex group and the triple groupâ…¡, the triple groupâ… and the triple groupâ…¡, the difference has statistical significance.(6) By comparing three groups of Chinese medical secondary symptom recovery rates, the difference (P<0.05) on improving dark menstruation blocks has statistical significance. In further compares betwee each other, P<0.05, the difference has statistical significance.(7) By comparing three groups of various physical sign recovery rates, the difference (P<0.05) on treating uterine motility limited pressing pain and left and right accessory pressing pains has statistical significance. In further compares, P< 0.05,betwee the duplex group and the triple groupâ…¡, the triple groupâ… and the triple groupâ…¡, the difference has statistical significance. cavity inflammation (kidney deficiency and blood stasis syndromes), the difference is remarkable and the curative effect is exact based on comparison of Chinese medicinal syndrome integral and physical sign integral before and after the therapy of each group. Wherein, the duplex group and the triple groupâ… on relieving the pelvic cavity pain, improving the local physical signs,healing the hypogastralgia and lumbosacral sore, healing the uterine motility limited pressing pain and the left and right accessory pressing pains are superior to the triple groupâ…¡. the duplex group is superior to the triple groupâ…¡on eliminating pelvic cavity masses.The triple groupâ…¡on healing the dark menstruation blocks has the most remarkable curative effect. |