Research On Legal Issues Of Face Recognition

The development of face recognition technology is inseparable from important face recognition data.China has a large population and rich face data resources,so the development speed of face recognition technology is very fast.With the rapid development of many related Internet technologies,the accuracy and accuracy of face recognition technology are continuously improved,which makes the development and utilization of face recognition information deepen.This technology has the characteristics of non-contact acquisition mode,autonomy of recognition process and universality of applicable scenes.However,with the wide application of face recognition technology in all walks of life,the problem of excessive collection of face recognition information also appears.Face recognition technology not only brings benefits to individuals,society and the country,but also has legal risks.Because face recognition information is a new type of personal information,which is "unique" to individuals.A person’s face recognition information can and can only be used to identify the specific person,which is unchangeable to ordinary individuals.Once the face recognition information is stolen or intentionally infringed,it will be harmful to the information oblige,The loss is immeasurable.Therefore,this technology should be prevented,otherwise it will bring legal risks such as information leakage,which will affect social harmony and stability.This paper cites the case of Guo v.Hangzhou "wildlife world" service contract dispute to analyze the legal problems in the use of face recognition technology.Firstly,it introduces the case of "the first case of face recognition" and summarizes the focus of controversy,and summarizes three focuses of controversy.First,whether it is necessary to increase face recognition in the wildlife world;Second,the effectiveness of store notices and SMS notices;Third,whether Guo can ask "wildlife world" to delete the collected personal information.Secondly,the focus of controversy in this case is analyzed.The conditions for enabling face recognition function should meet the legitimacy of purpose and the necessity of collection.Procedures for enabling face recognition function shall strictly follow effective notification procedures and explicit consent procedures.Finally,in face recognition,the oblige can exercise the deletion right,and the limitation and scope of the deletion right should be strictly limited.The right of deletion of the infringe should bear the corresponding tort liability.Through the analysis of the above contents,the activation of face recognition function is standardized and limited.Face recognition function seeks better development and protects the rights of information oblige.