Contrastive Study On Unequal Comparative Functional Semantic Filed In Russian,Chinese And Korean

There are many functions in human language,such as classificati on,summary,induction and so on.“comparison”is one of the basic functions of language like the above three functions.Comparison can be divided into comparison,unequal comparison.Although Russian,Chinese and Korean all have the means to express"unequal comparison",they have both similarities and differences.T herefore,this paper will apply the theory of contrastive linguistics,B ondarko’s triangle framework theory,the principle of“meaning-form”and the principle of synchronic contrast,and use the national corpu s of Russia and the CCL corpus,South Korea "(?)"to establish Russian,Chinese,Korean unequal comparative functional semantic field,and the three kinds of unequal comparative functional semantic field,four elements of the typical expression method of the nucleus zone in three kinds of unequal comparative functional semanti c field will be compared.The paper is divided into three parts:introduction,body and conclusion.The introduction mainly expounds the emergence of Bondarko’s functional grammar.Classification and structure of functional semantic fields;Research theory;The theoretical framework of Russian,Chinese and Korean functional semantic fields;the definition of " Unequal comparison"Research principles and methods;the purpose,significance and content of the research;.In addition,it also introduces the research situation of Russian,Chinese and Korean on the unequal compare.The second part is the body.In the text,the functional semantic fields of“unequal comparison”in Russian,Chinese and Korean are established.The functional semantic fields of three languages are divi ded into three zones:nuclear zone,near-nuclear zone and marginal zo ne.The nuclear zone is typical and commonly used expression means,the near-nuclear is next,then the marginal area.Then we compare the unequal comparative functional semantic field of Russian,Chinese and Korean.After that,we compare four elements of the typical expressio n method of the nucleus zone in three kinds of unequal comparative f unctional semantic field,and analyzes the commonalities and differenc es of the four elements.The four elements of the typical means of u nequal comparative expression in Russian are comparative objects,com parative basis,comparative result and comparative mark.Chinese and K orean are comparative subjects,comparative standards,comparative resu Its and comparative marks.Although the nomenclature of Russian is di fferent from Chinese and Korean,they can correspond to each other i n essence.The three languages all contain components of comparisons,comparative mark,comparative result.Therefore,in the following pa per,we use the comparative subjects,comparative standards,comparativ e results and comparative marks.In Russian,there are two typical str uctures:comparative subject+comparative result+comparative mark+comparative standard,or comparative subject+comparative result(comparative mark is built in comparative result)+comparative stand ard.In Chinese,it is usually the comparative subject+comparative mark + comparative standard+comparative result.There are two expr essions in Korean:comparative subject+comparative mark+compara tive standard+comparative result and comparative standard+compar ative mark+comparative subject+comparative result.The expression methods of typical unequal compare in the three languages can be par tially omitted,in some cases,the part structure of comparative standa rd and the part structure of comparative subject can be omitted in Ru ssian,while the part structure of comparative standard and comparativ e subject can’t be omitted in Chinese and Korean.In respect of comp arative mark,the common form of Russian comparative mark is compar ative degree+ЧЕМ and the comparative mark is built in comparative re sult.The common form of Chinese comparative mark is "比".The co mmon form of Korean comparative mark is "(?)".I n respect of c omparative result,in Russian,Chinese and Korean the comparative resul t is qualitative adjective or qualitative adverb,also there are other for ms of expression.The third part is the conclusion.Summarize the points analyzed i n the paper and put forward conclusions.