A Study On The Exit Mechanism Of List Of Persons Who Have Lost Credit

In order to solve the problem of "difficulty in execution",China has established a certain enforcement deterrent mechanism to punish those who are dishonest,and one of them is to announce the list of persons who are dishonest.Although the list system of dishonest executors has achieved certain results in continuous revision and improvement,the system design has not paid enough attention to the list withdrawal mechanism and the credit repair after withdrawal.In order to implement the policy purpose and protect the lawful rights and interests of the dishonest person,the article starts with the construction of a scientific and reasonable exit procedure and specific feasible repair methods to study the perfect path of the dishonesty person’s list exit mechanism.From the perspective of both the entity and the procedure,there are still many problems with the mechanism for withdrawing from the list of dishonesty offenders.As far as the existing substantive standards are concerned,there are still problems such as too strict exit conditions,insufficient classification of exit situations,and unscientific retention period of untrustworthy information.When the rights of the person whose dishonesty is breached are impaired,the unclear determination of the responsibility also seriously affects the rights of the person whose dishonesty is breached.In the operation of the procedure,the provisions on the subject of the review and the form of the award are not clear,and there is a lack of effective supervision of the entire procedure.At the same time,the assistance of the relevant subject needs to be improved.Announcement of the result of the dishonesty executor’s withdrawal from the list.Due to the imperfect information platform technology and the existence of information barriers between various departments,coupled with the insufficient number of executives and uneven quality,the announcement has not yet reached the desired state.Therefore,in terms of substantive standards,it is necessary to reasonably relax the exit conditions,refine the classification of exits,and determine the time for keeping the untrustworthy information according to different levels of standards.The Supreme People ’s Court should also specify relief and compensation measures.In the process,the relevant matters that the collegial panel reviews and withdraws from the list should be determined and made in the form of a decision.At the same time,the supervision should be strengthened,and the call for assistance in implementation should be implemented into judicial practice.Expand the executive team in terms of personnel and improve the overall quality of the executive staff.Improve the level of technology to improve the platform system,do everything possible to break the information barriers,and ensure that information is shared.In addition,the article creatively incorporates credit repair into the list-out mechanism of dishonest executed persons as an extension of list-out.Regarding the credit repair problem of the dishonesty subject,the existing measures are still relatively weak,and the authoritative legislation specifically for credit repair is temporarily vacant.It is necessary to establish and improve the infrastructure for credit repair,and it is also proposed to complete the supporting facilities simultaneously.With a view to omnidirectional and multi-channel credit repair methods,the trustee’s trustworthy behavior will be stimulated to eliminate the adverse effects of the trustless information.