Font Size: a A A

The Study Of The Implementation Of Scholarship Policy For Graduate Students

Posted on:2010-10-04Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:L LiFull Text:PDF
GTID:2167360275494117Subject:Educational Economy and Management
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Our country started the pilot reform of graduate student education in 2006, in 2007 the pilot universities expanded to 17 universities, including Beijing University, Tsinghua University, Fudan University, as well as East China Normal university and so on. Wang Xuming, The spokesperson of the Education department pointed out that "the primary coverage of the reform is to build persistent-effective and internal Incentive mechanism"at the routine conference of Education department hold in October 25, 2007.As we know that the key to "the safeguard mechanism" and "the excitation mechanism" lies in the effect of the scholarship for tuition fee, this is also the reason why I choose this topic. The traditional mode of graduate education "paying by the government"and"paying by the individual" is insufficient, and cannot stimulant the graduate students study hard and create actively,especially for those whose fee are paid by the government. But in the new pattern, on one hand, everyone should pay their fee by their own; on the other hand, they will get a certain kind of scholarship granted according to their behaviors. This new scholarship is called scholarship for fee just because it is based on the fact that everyone should pay their fee by their own.For the recent two years, the numerous operational problem, execution variation, student's extreme behavior coming in the experimental universities puzzle the universities; each stakeholder expects more reasonable and rational details to solve the problem above. Though as a student enjoying the traditional mode, stay with the fellow apprentice enjoying the new patter , I have some same feelings as them. As a formal and serious topic, this research uses the empirical method. On one hand, I carried on the questionnaire survey in H University, F university, T university, and J university (provided questionnaire 169); On the other hand, I called on the university policy makers, the grass-root administrative departments, the instructor, the tutor as well as the student themselves so that the interview and the questionnaire seal the conclusion mutually and really guarantee the objective. Besides I also quoted some cases from internet and the related literature search to support my related conclusion.According to my investigation, I find that the goal of the reform has not been realized. High amount of the scholarship also lead to money worship and cut-throat competition. In addition, the evaluation mode relying on quantification overly conflict with the fact that it is difficult to quantize the academic, all of which caused both the students and the teachers not to get down to their work, and weakened the entire universities' research atmosphere finally. What's the reason? and what affected its validity? In my opinion, the unreasonable proportion of scholarship itself, the different interests of all kinds of stakeholders,for example, the universities and the graduate schools usually only pay attention to the execution, but the grass-root departments also pays attention to steadies, hoping little trouble come up at work,and the students based on the personal interest hope to get more scholarship, but the policy lacks the balanced ability. At the same time, the scholarship policy also has not considered that the competition excessively can not agree with our country's traditional culture "Inequality rather than want is the cause of trouble." So, I proposed two proposals: adjust the proportion of scholarship to a low proportion of rewarding the good and a high proportion of the subsidization , or draw lessons from "subsidizes the package"overseas and divide the scholarship into many types so that each student may get a certain kind scholarship in terms of their certain advantage, at last accumulate what they have got to pay the school expense. Of course, in order to advance the policy and fulfill the achivement ,it is necessary to strengthen the communication of benefit clusters, at the same time, drawing up deliberated index scientifically which is in favour of the interest,the enquirying mind,and the thick study atmosphere is important.
Keywords/Search Tags:scholarship for fee, Safeguard mechanism, Incentive mechanism
PDF Full Text Request
Related items