Font Size: a A A

Comparative Study Of Unilateral And Bilateral Partial Laminectomy And Decompression MIS-TLIF In The Treatment Of Bilateral Symptomatic Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Posted on:2022-01-31Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:Y C WuFull Text:PDF
GTID:2544306602996499Subject:The orthopaedic
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Objective: compare the difference between the two surgical methods of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(MIS-TLIF)unilateral and bilateral decompression for the treatment of bilateral symptomatic degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis,and provide clinical data reference for choosing an appropriate surgical method to treat degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis(DLSS)with bilateral symptoms.Methods: the medical records of patients with bilateral symptomatic d-egenerative lumbar spinal stenosis from January 2019 to June 2020 in our hospital were collected,and 40 patients who met the criteria were selected for retrospective analysis.According to the operation methods,they were divided into unilateral decompression MIS-TLIF group(20 cases)and bilateral decompression MIS-TLIF group(20 cases)MIS-TLIF was performed by unilateral and bilateral laminectomy under quadrant.The general condition,operation time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative drainage,postoperative hospital stay,height of intervertebral foramen and intervertebral space,incidence of complications and bone graft fusion rate,as well as the visual analogue scale(VAS)and oswestry disability index(ODI)of all patients preoperative,1 month after surgery and at the last follow-up.Results: the postoperative follow-up was 9~12 months,with an average of10.7 months.There was no significant difference between the two groups of patients in gender,age,preoperative intervertebral space and intervertebral foramen height,preoperative VAS and ODI(P>0.05).All patients completed the operation successfully.The average operation time of unilateral decompression MIS-TLIF group was 180.90 ± 26.02 min and 223.16 ± 36.97 min in the bilateral decompression MIS-TLIF group,and the intraoperative bleeding of unilateral decompression MIS-TLIF group was 275.00 ± 159.35 ml and 575.00±324.64 ml in bilateral decompression MIS-TLIF group,and the postoperative drainage volume was 127 ± 51.91 ml in unilateral decompression MIS-TLIF group and379.15 ± 209.50 ml in bilateral decompression MIS-TLIF group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in postoperative hospital stay、postoperative intervertebral foramen height and intervertebral foramen height at 1 week,3 months and the last follow-up(P>0.05).One month after operation,there were significant differences in VAS and ODI between the two groups(P<0.05),and there was no significant difference in VAS and ODI between the two groups at the last follow-up(P > 0.05).However,the preoperative intervertebral foramina height,intervertebral space height,VAS and ODI of the two groups were significantly different from the postoperative comparison(P<0.05).There were no serious complications such as nerve root injury,vascular injury,loosening of internal fixation,broken screw,fusion cage sinking and formation of intraspinal hematoma in the two groups.There was one case of cerebrospinal fluid leakage one case of incision infection in the bilateral decompression MIS-TLIF group.There was no complications in the unilateral decompression MIS-TLIF.At the last follow-up,the fusion rate of bone graft was 100% in both groups,and the difference was not statistically significant.Conclusions: the clinical efficacy of unilateral partial laminectomy and decompression MIS-TLIF and bilateral partial laminectomy and decompression MIS-TLIF in the treatment of bilateral symptoms of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis is similar,but the operation time,intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage of unilateral decompression MIS-TLIF group are significantly less than those of bilateral decompression MIS-TLIF group.Unilateral decompression MIS-TLIF is a safe and effective method with less injury,shorter operation time and less bleeding.
Keywords/Search Tags:degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, unilateral laminectomy and decompression, bilateral laminectomy and decompression, minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
PDF Full Text Request
Related items
Analysis Of Clinical Efficacy Of Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminectomy And Bilateral Decompression In The Treatment Of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Clinical Efficacy And Radiological Analysis Of MIS-TLIF Unilateral Access With Bilateral Spinal Canal Decompression For Extreme Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Of Schizas Grade D
A Comparison Study Of Unilateral Interlaminar Decompression Using MED And The Laminectomy Decompression Combined With Internal Fixation In Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Treatment
Efficacy Comparison Of Bilateral Decompression Via Unilateral Approach TLIF And Bilateral Decompression MIS-TLIF In The Treatment Of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Tranforaminal Unilateral Approach For Bilateral Decompression In Lumbar Interbody Fusion For The Treatment Of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Clinical Study On The Treatment Of Geriatric Lumbar Degenerative Diseases With Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression
Unilateral Laminotomy For Bilateral Decompression Of Lumbar Spinal Steosis Disease Anatomic Studies
Efficacy Analysis Of Large Channel Endoscopic Unilateral Approach Bilateral Decompression And Posterior Approach Laminar Decompression With Interbody Fusion In The Treatment Of Single-segment Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Minimally Invasive Unilateral Approach With Bilateral Decompression By Tubular System For The Bilateral Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis
10 The Clinical Study Of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Treated With Unilateral Laminotomy For Bilateral Decompression Through Interlaminar Approach With Spinal Endoscopy