Research On The Path Of Rural New Collective Economic Organizations Participating In The Value Transformation Of Rural Ecological Resources

The key to rural industry success is to activate the natural resources that have been accumulated in rural regions for a long period.As the process of transforming the value of rural ecological resources frequently encounters problems such as unclear resource property rights,difficult asset evaluation,long production cycles of main materials,and mismatch between supply and demand for products,activating rural ecological resources and realizing the transformation of the value of rural ecological resources must rely on rural collective economic organizations with clear rights boundaries and geophysical principles.Traditional rural collective economic organizations have long been de-organized and de-collectivised,rendering them ineffective for developing and using rural natural resources in a coordinated way.To achieve effective participation of rural collective economic organizations,there is an urgent need to optimize collective economic organization structure and promote the transformation of rural collective economic organizations from old to new,so as to adapt to the value transfer of rural ecological resources.This research actively investigates the special mechanism of new collective economic organizations in the transformation of the value of ecological resources,which is based on the optimization of the structure of rural collective economic organizations.In order to balance the social security and market operation aspects of new collective economic organisations in the transformation of rural ecological resources,this study aims to optimise the structure of traditional collective economic organisations in terms of internal governance mechanisms and external operation mechanisms,so as to promote the transformation of traditional collective economic organisations into new collective economic organisations.The new collective economic organization explores the participation path of the new collective economic organization through the construction of specific participation mechanisms such as resource capitalization,asset elements,resource capital combination and principal-agent relationship.This research uses typical case studies and empirical analysis to put the theoretical premise to the test.The Happiness Lane Forest in Baitou Town,Chongzhou City,Sichuan Province,is chosen as a representative case study in this research to elaborate and analyze its development model and development state,and to further elaborate via cross-sectional comparison analysis.To supplement the case study,this study assesses the impact of the new collective economic organization’s participation in the transformation of rural ecological resources in Chongzhou City from the perspective of farmer satisfaction,and a multivariate logit ordered model is chosen to empirically analyze the data.The findings of this research lead to the following conclusions: First,rural collective economic organizations are the primary owners of rural ecological resources,with a long history of development,a legal and reasonable management status,and a long tradition of reciprocal cooperation,and are therefore appropriate subjects to participate in the transformation of the value of rural ecological resources.Second,it is also concluded that traditional rural collective economic economic organizations have not kept pace with the development of the times,and that rural collective economic organizations should be transformed into new collective economic organizations through the innovation of internal governance mechanisms and external business mechanisms,as well as through the analysis of the development history of rural collective economy.Third,an examination of the unique participation mechanism of the new collective economic organization reveals that a clear definition of property rights is required before the value of rural ecological resources can be transformed into a valuable asset.Through collective action,we can integrate ecological resources and bring about pricing.Promote the combination of resources and capital,with the government giving public capital assistance and enhancing infrastructure building at development locations as a foundation,and leveraging private capital investment from external social actors as a means of achieving these goals.Establish a strong principal-agent connection in order to complete the product exchange on the market.Fourth,after conducting case studies and comparative analysis,it is determined that the specific practice of transforming ecological resources’ worth in Dayu Village,Chongzhou City,is consistent with the specific participation mechanism of a new collective economic organization constructed in this study,and that both practices have their own inherent logic.A large increase in the quantity of rural ecological resource values changed may result from the engagement of new collective economic organizations in the transformation of rural ecological resource values.Fifth,the empirical analysis reveals that the average farmer’s satisfaction with the effect of the new collective economic organization’s participation in the transformation of rural ecological resources in the forest is 2.96,which falls between dissatisfied and average.Farmers’ opinion of the overall effect was influenced by their low satisfaction with the effect of converting the economic worth of natural resources,which was one of the factors considered.A positive and significant relationship existed between farmers’ satisfaction with the new collective economic organization’s participation in the transformation of rural ecological resource values and their level of identification with the definition of property rights and level of identification with collective action.There are also some realistic contradictions in the concrete practice of ecological resource value transformation in the western Sichuan forest,such as the high frequency of property rights disputes,the lack of clarity in the definition of collective membership,a general lack of communication among members within the organization,insufficient participation in the daily activities of members within the organization,lack of anti-risk capacity of emerging industries,and under-performed perferm functions by the board of supervisors and the board of directors.