Clinical Observation Of Acupuncture Treatment Of Chronic Superficial Gastritis With Disharmony Of Liver And Stomach Based On The Theory Of Rising And Falling

Objective:To observe the clinical effect of acupuncture in the treatment of chronic superficial gastritis with hepatogastric discordance,guided by the theoretical basis of rising and falling,and to provide clinical ideas and basis for acupuncture in the treatment of chronic superficial gastritis with hepatogastric discordance.Methods: Sixty patients who met the inclusion criteria and diagnostic criteria were randomly divided into a control group and an observation group.The control group received ordinary acupuncture,and the observation group received acupuncture treatment under the guidance of rising and falling theory.ST 25(bilateral),RN 6,RN 12,ST 36(left),LI 14(bilateral),PC 6(left),GB 34(right),and LR 3(bilateral).The treatment time is the same in the two groups,and acupuncture 5 times a week.Retain the needle for 40 minutes each time and rest for 2 days for a total of 3 weeks.Observe the gastrointestinal PRO score,Hp infection grade,main symptom score,TCM syndrome total score and quality of life score(SF-36)to evaluate its clinical effectiveness.Results:(1)Comparison of the scores of the two groups of gastrointestinal PRO:After treatment,the two groups were compared within and between the groups with P<0.05,the difference was statistically significant,indicating that the two groups had both in terms of improving the scores of gastrointestinal PRO Obvious effect,and the observation group is better than the control group in improving the integral effect of gastrointestinal PRO.(2)Comparison of Hp infection grading between the two groups: after treatment,the comparison between the two groups within and between the two groups had P<0.05,the difference was statistically significant,indicating that both groups had significant effects in improving Hp infection,while the observation group was improving Hp infection is better than the control group.(3)The scores of the main symptoms of CSG in the two groups: after treatment,the comparison between the two groups within and between the groups has a P<0.05,and the difference is statistically significant,indicating that both groups can improve the main symptoms of CSG,while the observation group is improving the main symptoms of CSG.The symptom score is better than the control group.The comparison of the total effective rate between the two groups is P<0.05,indicating that the observation group is better than the control group in terms of total effective rate.(4)Comparison of the total scores of TCM syndromes between the two groups: After treatment,the total scores of TCM syndromes of the two groups were P<0.05 within and between the groups,and the difference was statistically significant,indicating that the two treatments can improve TCM syndromes The total score,and the observation group is better than the control group in improving the total score of TCM syndromes.(5)Comparison of quality of life between the two groups: After the treatment,the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P=0.000<0.01),indicating that the improvement of the quality of life of the two groups has a significant effect;the results of the comparison between the groups Display: physiological function(P=0.000<0.05),body pain(P=0.004<0.01),general health(P=0.000<0.01),vitality(P=0.000<0.01),social function(P=0.000 < 0.01),Emotional function(P=0.000<0.01)The difference between the two groups is statistically significant,indicating that the observation group is better than the control group in improving these aspects,while in physiological function(P=0.088>0.05),mental health(P=0.250>0.05)),there is no significant difference,indicating that the two groups have similar treatment effects in these two aspects.Conclusion: 1.Clinical observations show that both the control group and the observation group have significant clinical effects in improving gastrointestinal PRO symptoms,Hp infection rate,clinical symptoms,TCM syndromes,and quality of life.2.The observation group was significantly better than the control group in most aspects of improving gastrointestinal PRO symptoms,Hp infection rate,clinical symptoms,TCM syndromes,and quality of life.