| BackgroundWith the progress of network technology,this technology is gradually introduced into the treatment of hyperopia amblyopia.Binocular vision perception network training brings a broader prospect for the treatment of hyperopia amblyopia.To establish and improve the binocular visual function of hyperopia amblyopia patients has been the concern of many scholars,and it is also a new requirement for the cure of hyperopia amblyopia patients.This paper mainly discusses the difference between binocular vision perception network training and traditional treatment of hyperopia amblyopia,especially the improvement of binocular vision.ObjectiveTo explore the difference between binocular vision perception network training and traditional methods in the treatment of hyperopia amblyopia,especially the improvement of binocular vision such as stereopsis acuity,accommodation,contrast sensitivity and so on.MethodsA retrospective analysis of 80 cases of hyperopia amblyopia in our hospital from January 2018 to June 2019 was conducted.According to different treatment methods,they were divided into group A: binocular vision perception network training group(N = 41,n= 75),Group B: traditional treatment group(N = 39,n = 74),Group A and group B were divided into 5-7-year-old group and 8-12-year-old group according to their age;mild amblyopia group and moderate severe amblyopia group according to the degree of amblyopia.The best corrected visual acuity,total effective rate,contrast sensitivity,P100 latency and amplitude of visual evoked potential(VEP)and visual evoked potential(VEP)were compared before and after 8 months of treatment The differences of the lag,amplitude,sensitivity and stereoacuity were observed.In this analysis,SPSS19.0 was used as the statistical software,and(x ± s)was used to count the descriptive data,and the t-test was carried out.The statistical value of the difference was judged by P < 0.05(with statistical significance).Results1.Comparison of best corrected visual acuity:The best corrected visual acuity of group A was significantly better than that of group B(P<0.05);the difference of best corrected visual acuity before and after treatment in 5-7-year-old group was significantly better than that in 8-12-year-old group(P<0.05);the difference of best corrected visual acuity before and after treatment in mild amblyopia group was significantly better than that in moderate and severe amblyopia group(P<0.05).2.Comparison of total effective rate: After 8 months of treatment,the total effective rate of group A was significantly higher than that of group B(P<0.05),the total effective rate of children aged 5-7 years was significantly higher than that of 8-12 years old(P<0.05);the total effective rate of mild amblyopia group was significantly higher than that of moderate and severe amblyopia group(P<0.05).3.Comparison of contrast sensitivity: After 8 months of treatment,the spatial frequency of 5 groups in group A was significantly higher than that in group B(P<0.05);in group A,the spatial frequency of 12.0(C/D)and 18.0(C/D)groups in group A was significantly better than that in group 8-12 years old(P<0.05);the difference of spatial frequency of 5 groups in mild amblyopia group before and after treatment was significantly better than that in moderate and severe amblyopia groups(P<0.05).4.Comparison of latency and amplitude of visual evoked potential P100:After 8months of treatment,the latency and amplitude of visual evoked potential(VEP)in group A were better than those in group B(P<0.05);the latency and amplitude of visual evokedpotential(VEP)in 5-7-year-old group were significantly higher than those in 8-12 group(P<0.05);the latency and amplitude of visual evoked potential in mild amblyopia group were significantly higher than those in moderate and severe amblyopia groups(P<0.05).5.Comparison of regulatory lag,amplitude and sensitivity: After 8 months of treatment,the amplitude of AMP in group A was significantly better than that in group B(P < 0.05),and there was no significant difference in the amount of accommodation lag and AF between group A and group B(P > 0.05).The difference of AMP in group A and group B before and after treatment was significantly better than that in children aged 8-12years(P < 0.05);the difference of amplitude of modulation lag,AMP and AF between mild amblyopia group and moderate and severe amblyopia group was significant(P <0.05).6.Comparison of stereopsis acuity: After 8 months of treatment,the proportion of SA ≤ 60 "in group A was significantly higher than that in group B(P<0.05),but there was no significant difference in the proportion of SA ≤ 60 between 5-7 years old group and8-12 years old group(P>0.05);the proportion of SA ≤ 60" in mild amblyopia group was significantly better than that in moderate and severe amblyopia group(P<0.05).ConclusionThe binocular vision perception network training method is better than the traditional amblyopia treatment,It has curative effect on older children and moderate and severe amblyopia. |
PDF Full Text Request