| Objective:To compare Li Tang Ointment combined with oral hypoglycemic drugs to treat patients with type 2 diabetes by deficiency of qi and yin in anxiety,by studying its effect on patients’PPGE,FPG,2h-PG,HbA1c,GA,TC,TG,BMI,TCM syndrome scores and points of generalized anxiety disorder-7 and then verify the clinical efficacy of Li Tang Ointment,provide theoretical basis for further clinical promotion.Methods:72 patients who met the design criterion were collected.According to the principle of random control,they were divided into a control group and a experimental group in a 1:1ratio.The control group was given basic treatments include metformin and acarbose for hypoglycemic treatment.The test group was treated with Li Tang Ointment based on the above basic treatment.After 4 weeks(28 days)of treatment,compare the changes of TCM syndrome scores,PPGE,points of generalized anxiety disorder-7,FPG,2h-PG,HbA1c,GA,TC,TG,BMI before and after treatment in the two groups,and analyze the correlation between points of generalized anxiety disorder-7 and PPGE,and the correlation between points of generalized anxiety disorder-7 and blood glucose related indicators.Results:1.TCM syndrome scores:The differences in the experimental group before and after treatment was statistically significant(P<0.01);the differences in the control group before and after treatment was not statistically significant(P>0.05);the differences between the two groups after treatment was statistically significant(P<0.01),and the TCM syndrome scores of the experimental group decreased more significantly than that of the control group.2.Generalized anxiety disorder-7(GAD-7)scores:The differences in the experimental group before and after treatment was statistically significant(P<0.01);the differences between the control group before and after treatment was not statistically significant(P>0.05);the differences between the two groups after treatment was statistically significant(P<0.01).The GAD-7 scores of the experimental group has decreased more significantly than that of the control group.3.Postprandial glucose excursion(PPGE):The differences in the experimental group before and after treatment was statistically significant(P<0.01);the differences in the control group before and after treatment was statistically significant(P<0.05);the differences between the two groups after treatment was statistically significant(P<0.01).PPGE of the experimental group decreased more significantly than the control group.4.Fast plasma glucose(FPG),2 hours postprandial blood glucose(2h-PG),Glycosylated hemoglobin(HbA1c),Glycosylated albumin(GA):(1)The differences of FPG in the experimental group was statistically significant(P<0.01),the differences of FPG in the control group before and after treatment was statistically significant(P<0.01),and the differences between two groups was statistically significant(P<0.01);(2)The differences of 2h-PG in the experimental group was statistically significant(P<0.01),the differences of 2h-PG in the control group before and after treatment was statistically significant(P<0.01),and the differences between two groups was statistically significant(P<0.01);(3)The differences of HbA1c in the experimental group was not statistically significant(P>0.05),the differences of HbA1c in the control group before and after treatment was not statistically significant(P>0.05),and the differences between two groups was not statistically significant(P>0.05);(4)The differences of GA in the experimental group was statistically significant(P<0.01),the differences of GA in the control group before and after treatment was statistically significant(P<0.01),and the differences between two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).5.Total triglycerides(TG),Total cholesterol(TC)and Body mass index(BMI):(1)The differences of TG before and after treatment in the experimental group was statistically significant(P<0.05),while the differences of TG before and after treatment in the control group was not statistically significant(P>0.05),and the differences between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05);(2)The differences of TC before and after treatment in the experimental group was statistically significant(P<0.05),while the differences of TC before and after treatment in the control group was not statistically significant(P>0.05),and the differences between the two groups was not statistically significant(P>0.05);(3)The differences of BMI before and after treatment in the experimental group was not statistically significant(P>0.05),the differences of BMI before and after treatment in the control group was not statistically significant(P>0.05),and the differences between the two groups was not statistically significant(P>0.05).6.Correlation analysis:PPGE is positively correlated with 2h-PG(r=0.448,P=0.000),positively correlated with HbA1c(r=0.193,P=0.029),positively correlated with GA(r=0.210,P=0.017),and positively correlated with TC(r=0.207,P=0.019),positively correlated with GAD-7 scores(r=0.383,P=0.000),positively correlated with TCM syndrome scores(r=0.376,P=0.000),and negatively correlated with BMI(r=-0.2,P=0.024);GAD-7 scores is positively correlated with FPG(r=0.356,P=0.000)is positively correlated with 2h-PG(r=0.401,P=0.000),and is positively correlated with HbA1c(r=0.278,P=0.001),positive correlation with GA(r=0.361,P=0.000),positive correlation with PPGE(r=0.383,P=0.000),positive correlation with TCM syndrome scores(r=0.516,P=0.000).Conclusion:1.Li Tang Ointment combined with oral hypoglycemic drugs has a certain effect on patients with type 2 diabetes by deficiency of qi and yin in anxiety,which is reflected in the reduction of TCM syndrome scores,GAD-7 scores,PPGE,FPG,2h-PG,GA,TG;2.There is a positive correlation between PPGE and blood glucose levels of T2DM patients with deficiency of qi and yin in anxiety state and GAD-7 scores,which provides a basis for us to control PPGE and blood glucose levels to treat the anxiety of such patients. |