The irrelevance of 'demarcationist' philosophies of science for the sociology of knowledge |
Posted on:2007-02-12 | Degree:M.A | Type:Thesis |
University:Simon Fraser University (Canada) | Candidate:Mittendorff, Paul A | Full Text:PDF |
GTID:2447390005970380 | Subject:Sociology |
Abstract/Summary: | |
Sociology of Knowledge is influenced by theories of philosophy which demarcate science from non science. It is argued furthermore that scientific enquiry can be divided into a context of justification and a context of discovery.;The context of discovery includes human circumstances but these cannot contribute to the justification of science as a claim to knowledge.;I argue that the arguments presented are crucially flawed and cannot serve to justify any principled demarcation or division of contexts.;I argue that scientific knowledge may well be presented in an artificial language but this language cannot be demarcated from ordinary language.;Within the context of justification, notions such as "observation language", "theory", " axiomatization" etc are sufficient to fully explain the results of scientific enquiry.;Scientific enquiry can be placed in a broader cognitive outlook supported by broader cultural practices and ordinary language.;Keywords: Sociology of Knowledge; scientific enquiry; context of justification; context of discovery. |
Keywords/Search Tags: | Science, Scientific enquiry, Context, Language, Justification |
|
Related items |