A Study Of Risk-taking Behaviors And The Impact Factors In Environmental Migrant Children

Objective To compare the Risk-taking Behaviors between ecological immigrant adolescents and non-migrant indigenous adolescents, analyze the impact factors of environmental migrant and indigenous adolescents' risk-taking behaviors, and to compare the differences of the impact factors, and to provide scientific basis for prevention.Methods Using cluster sampling method, Adolescent Risk-taking Questionnaire-Risk Behavior Scale(ARQ-RB)?Eysenck Personality Questionnaire(EPQ-C)?Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnairewas(CERQ-C), Family Environment Scale(FES) and a self-made questionnaire were used in 634 environmental migrant adolescents and 609 non-migrant indigenous adolescents. To analyze the correlation between youth risk-taking behaviors and impacts of the above factors, hierarchical multiple regression analysis was used to analyze the effects of these migration factors on risk-taking behaviors.Results Adolescent Risk-taking behavior questionnaire total score and each factor scores of ecological immigrant adolescents were higher than the indigenous adolescents, the Risk-taking behavior scores of male are higher than female, and the 15-year-old group scored the highest risktaking behavior. Analyze the correlations between risk-taking behaviors and the factors, hierarchical multipleregression analysis was used after controlling the confounding factors. Hierarchical multipleregression analysis showed personality, cognitive emotion regulation strategies and family environment were found to be impact factors of adolescents' risk-taking behaviors, but there are differences between the two group. Impact factors for migration adolescents' risk-taking behavior as follows: psychoticism trait was found to be significant predictors of risk-taking behavior' total scores ? treason ? antisocial behavior and reckless behavior(?=0.181, P<0.01;?=0.186, P<0.001;?=0.118, P<0.05;?=0.165, P<0.01); blaming others was found to be a impact factor of reckless behavior(?=0.124, P<0.05); cohesion was found to be the protective factor of treason(?=-0.089, P<0.05), emotional expression and contradiction were found to be significant predictors of risk-taking behavior' total scores(?=0.104,P<0.05;?=0.104, P<0.05). Impact factors for non-migrant indigenous adolescents' risk-taking behavior as follows: neuroticism trait was found to be impact factor of risk-taking behavior' total scores and antisocial behavior(?=0.093,P<0.05; ?=0.109, P<0.05), psychoticism trait was found to be a significant predictor of risk-taking behavior' total scores ? treason ? antisocial behavior and reckless behavior(?=0.213, P<0.001;?=0.278, P<0.001; ?=0.168,P<0.001;?=0.287, P<0.001), extraversion trait was found to be a risk factor of sensation seeking behavior(?=0.114, P<0.001); Factively refocus was found to be a risk factor of risk-taking behavior' total scores and antisocial behavior(?=0.098, P<0.05;?=0.102, P<0.05),F-rational analysis was found to be a significant predictor of risk-taking behavior' total scores and treason(?=0.135, P<0.01;?=0.101, P<0.05); cohesion was found to be a significant predictor of risk-taking behavior' total scores and treason(?=-0.124, P<0.01; ?=-0.123, P<0.01), contradiction was found to be a significant predictor of treason(?=0.083,P<0.05), informative and entertainment were found to be impact factors of sensation seeking(?=0.081, P<0.05; ?=0.083, P<0.05).Conclusions This study suggests that the frequency of the ecological immigrant adolescents' risk-taking behaviors were higher than non-migrant indigenous adolescents. Personality factors,cognitive emotion regulation strategies and family environment are associated with the development of risk-taking behaviors, there are differences between the two group.