Literature As An "intervention"—Jacques Ranci(?)re Discusses The Politics Of Literature

The relationship between literature and politics has always been the key to literary research.The French philosopher Jacques Rancière carried out a new combing of literary and political relations based on a series of theoretical terms and prerequisites of "distribution of the sensibility " and "disability".Through the reinterpretation of literature as a kind of intervention and literature and political connotation,on the basis of "homogeneous heterogeneity",the reshaping of the relationship model is completed,and the external research and the internal research mode are realized breakthrough.By close-reading the works of Gustave Flaubert,Marcel Proust and Stephane Mallarme,Ronsee argues that literature is,to some extent,marked by "conflict",With the "intervention" of time and space,revealing the obscured "no division" to achieve the resistance to the existing order.At the same time,through the study of Plato's "political" concept,he pointed out that politics was an expression,with the aim of revealing an imbalance.Therefore,he concluded that literature and politics are essentially the same,are a kind of intervention,do literature is to do politics.The beginning of the political thinking,so that its theory points to aesthetics,and the three aesthetic system of induction,And then the theory points to the "intervention" of the study,and ultimately "intervention" to achieve a development,based on a holistic thinking.As a result,there is a clear link between politics and aesthetics.Literature,located in the aesthetic system,naturally with the political generated a link to show the essence of life.To "equality" as a preset,combined with sharp language style and writing,he realized the "micro" on the "macro" resistance.This also brought his applause at the same time,also exposed the shortcomings of its theory.His theory of literature and political relations,born in its initial presupposition,and all the interpretation of the final return to the default,the validity of the conclusions based on a basic preset cycle on the basis of success,Its definition of literature and politics to the essence of the problem into a standardproblem,as to the interpretation of the text is actually a person's carnival.This implies that the theory itself is still immature,not so much the theory of innovation,rather than the theory in a sense of retrogression,of course,all this only on the relationship between literature and politics.