Font Size: a A A

The Analyzing And Comparing On International Conflict Views Of Marxism And Western Major International Relation Theory

Posted on:2015-06-30Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:F Y ChenFull Text:PDF
GTID:2296330467964636Subject:International politics
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
The problem of international conflicts is all along the core issue of international relations theories and the diverse theoretical schools hold differing theories to these issues. This paper induces international conflicts theories from the aspects of differing views on the nature of international conflicts, and its causes, subjects, resolutions between the western mainstream IR theory (liberalism/realism)and Marxism.This paper analyzes the Western mainstream international relations theory on the subject of international conflict from the perspective of the modern nation-state and non-state actors to carry out, in general, or from state actors in particular the level of international actors to carry out, Marxism theories of international relations from the perspective of class and class to the country, the angle is more profound and special Analysis on the causes of international conflict, the Western mainstream international relations theory is the impact of anarchy value of the relationship between international actors of the international community, that is mainly due to the anarchy of the international community, resulting in between international actors tensions, and produce an international conflict, unbalanced Marxist perspective of international relations between the regions from where it is to carry out the development, analysis of the two different angles, Marxism is more emphasis on economic factors.Analysis of the nature of international conflict, the Western mainstream international relations theory on the nature of international conflict analysis, international conflicts in the world today exists mainly physical conflict, this is a reasonable representation outlined in today’s international conflicts, but not deep enough. Marxist theory is that the nature of international relations, international conflicts today are mainly ideological conflict, this time on a more level expression of international conflict research and analysis.For the analysis of the three above, to resolve international conflicts. And on the way to resolve international conflicts, the Western mainstream international relations theory that there is a unified view of the world through the establishment of the government to solve international conflicts, but this goal is difficult to achieve, so they were turned to a different way to resolve, but these are just ways to ease international conflict can not be eradicated. The Marxist theory of international relations for the international conflict solution is to build a communist society completely eliminate ideological differences and the country, which is a kind of international conflict fundamentally resolved.In short, there are differences between the two theories are and similarity, but there are two theories strengths and weaknesses, and only to analyze and compare the two theories and absorb the essence of traditional Chinese culture, in order to understand today’s international conflicts, for the construction of an international conflict theory with Chinese characteristics to provide strong support and help.
Keywords/Search Tags:International Conflict, Marxism IR Theory, Western Mainstream IRTheory
PDF Full Text Request
Related items