The Research On The Quality Follow-up Evaluation System Of Army Clinical Medicine Doctors

In order to have a better understanding and fully mastered Dr. graduates in clinical medicine aftergraduation in the real work situation, also for the purpose of setting a standard for deepening theeducation of Dr. in military medical university reform. According to quality evaluation ofdegree-awarding system and estimation of the related literature, this thesis, on the basis of existingresearch results and references from both domestic and overseas, combining with the characteristics ofthe army, build the armed forces graduated from clinical disciplines Dr. quality tracking evaluationindex system, using the established evaluation index system for military medical university graduatedoctoral quality condition has carried on the experimental measurement, aimed at establishing a set ofscientific, reasonable and it was characterized by time of graduation PhD quality tracking evaluationindex system, in order to enlarge the scale, persistent quality tracking evaluation lay a certainfoundation. On the measured results, the current military medical university clinical disciplines doctoral education put forward some existing problems, by giving some opinions and suggestions forimprovement.This study based on the analysis clinical disciplines doctoral education’s characteristics,cultivating military law, on the basis of the actual work tasks, set wartime model, for instant, to buildclinical medical doctoral student carries out task model, using sticky theory has carried on the demandanalysis, find out the clinical disciplines Dr. Should have ability quality, according to the actual demandbuild accord with clinical disciplines needed for the forces in the new period Dr. Graduate qualityevaluation system for initial tracking; Using Delphi method, hire a long-term engaged in the work ofgraduate student education and clinical experts and professors of20experts consultation, and uses thefactor analytic method to optimize the initial index, and finally establish military and political quality,the level of clinical, teaching and research level and development potential of4first-level indicators,including: the cultivation of political ideology, ethics, military, mental and physical conditions and15level two indexes such as clinical work of military medical university clinical science graduate PhDquality tracking evaluation index system.On the basis of the established evaluation index system, we set up the military clinical disciplinesgraduate Dr. Integrated performance evaluation, set up to graduation, Dr. Basic situation andperformance as the main content of the military medical university clinical disciplines Dr. Graduatesurvey questionnaire. Reference a military medical university doctoral student allocations for nearly adecade of the truth, choose9military area commands and services and arms and central hospital, set Dr.graduated during2005-2009military clinical medical university clinical as evaluation and investigationtargets, sent out160sets of evaluation and the questionnaire, by graduates of self-evaluation and othersevaluation, a combination of graduates working in the military hospital comprehensive situation. Byuse of Excel software for data entry and finishing, and uses SPSS13.0statistical software, using thestatistical methods such as correlation analysis and variance analysis to sort out the indicators ofstatistical analysis.According to the results: through random evaluation sheet, took98valid questionnaire andevaluation sheets out of160,○1the overall quality of Dr. of graduates were good, overall fineproportion was96.94%; overall evaluation of hospital fine rate was97.96%.○2The highest Dr.Graduated self-review score index was "clinical level" and "military and political quality, low proportion score is" teaching level "and" potential "; the review from others were similar to self-review.○3By the relative analysis from Pearson, graduates self-report average score and others scored anaverage of the correlation coefficient was0.341, there was positive correlation (P=0.045), statisticallysignificant, self-evaluation of graduates and the hospital he evaluation results are basically identical,but the correlation coefficient is0.341, it is less consistence.○4Graduates overall quality score byanalysis of variance has no statistical significance (self-evaluation: F=0.64, P=0.72>0.05; he review:F=0.99, P=0.44>0.05), shows that eight hospitals (only1person, navy general hospital was notincluded in the comparison) graduates to the overall quality were roughly the same;○5The overallquality by analysis for Dr. graduated in different years which the variance is also no statisticalsignificance (self-evaluation: F=0.75, P=0.56>0.05, review: F=1.02, P=0.4>0.05), this is showsthat quality of Dr. graduated in different years are almost the same.The main education problems of Dr. graduates reflected from the graduates’ self-evaluation,feedbacks from the hospital review and questionnaire surveys is: lack of clinical ability and innovationability, must increase the intensity of doctoral training mode reform, have to improve theimplementation of the system of professional degree of clinical medicine, need to accelerate theinnovation ability as the core of doctoral education theory reform.