| Objective:To compare the effects of the micromolecular polypeptide of Rho/ROCKII inhibitors and TDZD-8on the axon regeneration of DRGNs in rats in vitro.To compare the effect of promoting axon regeneration and functional recovery with intrathecal administration micromolecular polypeptide of Rho/ROCKII inhibitors and TDZD-8after spinal cord injury in rats. Methods:5healthy adult female SD rats were subjected to weight-drop impact causing complete paraplegia at T9level and the T8-10spinal cord extracts (SCE) were harvested at7th days after spinal cord injury. All thoracic-lumbar DRGs (20-25DRGs per rat) of neogenesis SD rats (<5d) were harvested under the stereopsis microscope, and then DRNGs were digested, centrifuged, cultured, purified and indentified.The experiment was divided into5groups:group A was DRGNs+60μl PBS, group B was DRGNs+60μl SCE, group C was DRGNs+60μl SCE+20μl liposome, group D was DRGNs+60μl SCE+1μM TDZD-8, group E was DRGNs+60μl SCE+20μl liposome+8μg polypeptide. The axonal length, positive expression of Tubulin βⅢ and mean fluorescence density at axonal distal end of DRGNs were observed with phase-contrast microscope and immunofluorescence after co-culture during2days.280healthy adult female SD rats were randomly divided into7groups(40/group), group A was normal control group, group B was Sham operation group, group C was operation control group, group D-G were injected with PBS, liposome, TDZD-8, polypeptide and liposome respectively Group B were only resected the vertebral plate.Group C-G were subjected to weight-drop impact causing complete paraplegia at T9level, and insert a soft catheter in cavitas subarachnoidealis of L4level. Different drugs were injected through microinjector in the group D-group G after1h of SCI,12μl perd day,persist two weeks. The expression area of growth associated protein-43(GAP-43) were observed and calculated by immunohistochemical staining at24hã€72hã€1Wã€2W after SCI. The apoptosis cells were observed and calculated by TUNEL staining at8hã€24hã€72hã€1W after SCI. The SEP were monitored at24hã€3Wã€6Wã€8W after SCI. The axonal growth were observed through anterograde tracing and retrograde tracing at6W after SCI. The BBB scale were detected at3ã€6ã€8w after SCI. All of the experimental results were demonstrated by x±s and calculated by SPSS11.5statistics software with the method of variance analysis. Result:The average lengths of neuronal axon were319.78±51.86μm in group A,107.59±27.53μm in group B,101.03±32.37μm in group C,282.05±45.79μm in group D and296.57±36.81μm in group E respectively at2days after co-culture. The mean fluorescence densities at axonal distal end were207.95±4.90AFU/μm in group A,66.13±4.45AFU/μm in group B,66.31±6.01AFU/μm in group C,267.81±13.21AFU/μm in group D and309.59±17.08AFU/μm in group E respecviely at2days after co-culture.There was no difference between group B and C (P>0.05), group B and C were significant difference compared with other group (P<0.01), group D was significant difference compared with group E (P<0.05). The expression area of GAP-43(mm2):24h:group A:31.11±1.82, group B:37.05±1.43,group C:42.23±2.89,group D:41.98±2.87,group E:42.21±2.37,group F:74.33±3.55, group G:82.86±3.31.72h (mm2):group A:31.55±1.37,group B:39.65±2.27,group C50.53±2.73, group D:52.39±2.52, group E:52.18±3.24,group F:84.93±4.31,group G:94.39±3.49.1W:group A:31.13±1.64, group B:43.23±2.98, group C:64.63±3.45,group D:65.31±3.45, group E:65.21±3.73, group F:108.76±6.48, group G:113.30±7.38.2W:group A:31.11±1.49, group B:44.71±3.67,group C53.22±5.45, group D:51.51±5.49,group E:52.81±4.80, group F:157.83±5.02, group G:169.37±7.96. At each time,the area of group F and group G were significant more than group Cã€Dã€E(P<0.01), there was no difference between group Cã€Dã€E and between group Aã€B(P>0.05). At each time,the area of group G were significant more than group F (P<0.05). The mean counted apoptosis cells of TUNEL staining:8h:group A:7.86±1.45, group B:9.33±2.44,group C49.00±5.49,group D:49.60±5.11,group E:50.53±4.27, group F:44.53±3.85,group G:39.73±4.06.24h:group A:8.53±1.41, group B:10.20±3.42, group C54.80±5.39, group D:54.80±5.41,group E:54.67±4.82,group F:47.33±3.89, group G:42.40±5.45.72h:group A:8.40±1.90, group B:9.27±2.40, group C:45.60±3.80group D:46.20±5.63, group E:45.87±7.64, group F:38.47±4.75,group G:31.45±5.07.1W:group A:7.33±1.59, group B:7.73±1.58, group C:15.67±2.26, group D:15.53±2.26, group E:15.47±2.50, group F:12.53±3.36,group G:10.27±3.15. At each time,the counted apoptosis cells of group F and group G were significant less than group Cã€Dã€E(P<0.05), there was no difference between group Cã€Dã€E and between group Aã€B(P>0.05). At each time, the counted apoptosis cells of group G were significant less than group F (P<0.05). The area of anterograde tracing:the injury segments(mm2):group A:220.80±10.39, group B:95.01±5.39, group C:34.06±1.78, group D:35.96±3.29, group E:35.18±2.85, group F:76.48±1.11,group G:84.68±2.45.Following the injury segments(mm2): group A:220.80±10.39, group B:73.80±3.49, group C:14.18±2.04, group D:14.48±3.33, group E:14.02±1.71, group F:33.46±2.77, group G:43.20±1.54.The Fluorescent tracing area of group F and group G were significant more than group Cã€Dã€E(P<0.05), there was no difference between group Cã€Dã€E (P>0.05). The Fluorescent tracing area of group G was significant more than group F. The latency of SEP (ms):preoperative:group A:14.36±1.94, group B:15.98±3.41, group C:15.98±1.68, group D:16.12±1.29, group E:16.06±3.69, group F:15.40±2.18, group G:16.16±2.30.24h after operation:group A:16.10±1.39, group B: 15.96±3.61, group C:37.44±5.12, group D:36.84±5.46, group E:36.52±4.35, group F:35.70±4.45, group G:38.30±1.46.3W after operation:group A:15.34±1.41, group B:16.02±3.85, group C:35.94±4.61, group D:35.90±5.61, group E:35.66±3.99, group F:30.42±1.02, group G:26.34±0.94.6W after operation:group A:14.70±0.82, group B:16.24±1.97, group C:31.42±2.30, group D:31.02±3.44, group E:30.74±0.95, group F:26.60±1.66, group G:23.26±2.81.8W after operation:group A:14.38±1.35, group B:14.44±1.47, group C:28.40±1.05, group D:29.03±5.59, group E:28.94±4.46, group F:23.56±3.45, group G:19.10±2.47. There was no difference between each group at preoperative (P>0.05). At24h after operation the latency of group C-G were significant longer than preoperative (P<0.01)and there was no difference between group C-G.At3Wã€6Wã€8W after operation the latency of group G and group F were significant shorter than group Cã€Dã€E(P<0.05). The latency of group G was significant shorter than group F (P<0.05), and there was no difference between group Cã€Dã€E (P>0.05). The wave amplitude of SEP (μV):preoperative:group A:15.30±4.11, group B:16.48±4.58, group C:15.50±3.04, group D:15.32±3.52,group E:16.00±3.32, group F:17.26±3.23, group G:15.60±2.29.24h after operation:group A:15.18±4.05, group B:14.98±1.95, group C:1.26±0.30, group D:1.28±0.61, group E:1.16±0.46, group F:1.28±0.48, group G:1.22±0.43.3W after operation: group A:14.96±3.39, group B:16.06±2.99, group C:1.46±0.48, group D:1.36±0.4, group E:1.32±0.56, group F:4.88±0.26, group G:6.92±0.36.6W after operation: group A:14.96±3.10, group B:16.52±1.29, group C:2.62±0.94, group D:2.28±0.30, group E:2.68±0.58, group F:5.48±0.99, group G:9.48±3.27.8W after operation:group A:15.14±2.33, group B:16.18±3.44, group C:2.8±0.82, group D:2.94±0.71, group E:3.20±0.78, group F:6.94±0.36, group G:10.07±3.67. There was no difference between each group at preoperative(P>0.05). At24h after operation the wave amplitude of group C-G were significant lower than preoperative (P<0.01)and there was no difference between group C-G.At3Wã€6Wã€8W after operation the wave amplitude of group G and group F were significant higher than group Cã€Dã€E (P<0.05). The latency of group G was significant higher than group F (P<0.05), and there was no difference between group Cã€Dã€E (P>0.05). The BBB scale:The BBB scale of group A and group B were21.3W:group C:5.0±1.59, group D:5.0±2.35, group E:5.2±0.84, group F:7.6±1.14, group G:10.0±2.0.6W:group C:5.6±2.07, group D:5.8±2.78, group E:5.8±1.30, group F:9.4±1.82, group G:2.0±2.35.8W:group C:8.0±1.00, group D:8.2±2.17, group E:8.0±1.00, group F:12.4±1.95, group G:15.8±1.92. At each time,the BBB scale of group F and group G were significant more than group Cã€Dã€E(P<0.05), there was no difference between group Cã€Dã€E (P>0.05). At each time, the BBB scale of group G were significant more than group F (P<0.05). The area of retrograde tracing:the injury segments(mm2):group A:192.78±6.14, group B:93.88±4.12, group C:23.86±2.69, group D:23.50±1.70, group E:24.90±2.25group F:56.16±2.91, group G:63.02±3.03. Upper the injury segments(mm2):group A:192.78±6.14, group B:73.88±5.12, group C:11.32±1.47, group D:11.48±1.39, group E:11.64±1.39, group F:26.60±2.16, group G:31.18±1.49.The Fluorescent tracing area of group F and group G were significant more than group Cã€Dã€E(P<0.05), there was no difference between group Cã€Dã€E (P>0.05). The Fluorescent tracing area of group G was significant more than group F. Conclusion:The micromolecular polypeptide of Rho/ROCKâ…¡ inhibitors can promot axon extend and more effective than TDZD-8. The micromolecular polypeptide of Rho/ROCKâ…¡ inhibitors can decrease secondary injury of SCI, improve regeneration of axon and functional recovery, and more effective than TDZD-8. |