To Research The Semantic Feature And Prompted Scheme About '(?)' And '(?)'

In this paper,based on academic point of Korean-speaking.For Chinese students have to understand from the perspective of the Korean language education.About speculating usage sentence '(?)' and '(?)',Examine the semantics functions,and study the prompted plan aim at Chinese student.In this paper,were divided into five chapters.The first chapter expounds the necessity of Korean grammar education, and the necessity of explaining the similar syntax to the semantic function. Followed by clarified the content of research and the method of '(?)' and '(?)'.Chapter II,According to previous research and theoretical foundation, and based on the Korean education standpoint.Careful analysis '(?)' and '(?)' semantic function from Korean education angle,structure, person,description,judgment,functions,convinced the degree and corresponding form in Chinese and Korean.The results show that the'( ?)' real significance is the "subj ective speculation",'(?)' real meaning is "cause speculation", and find two syntax forms of Chinese counterparts.Namely:the equivalent of two usage,"like,may be,it seems…"However,as the basis to judge the difference and auxiliary verbs '(?)' and '(?)' differences,the two have different grammatical forms of Chinese counterparts.'(?)' can be translated as"I feel,I think,I want to...",'(?)' translated as "looks like...." Secondly,the comparison of the two syntax from six aspects on this paper,compare results,the basis for judging the difference '(?)' and '(?)' usage subject to many restrictions,convinced that the degree of difference.The third chapter,Conducted a survey on middle and senior class students for study Korean in universities.The purpose of this survey is get of the students understanding for speculate grammar,and how to use the syntax.The Survey divided into three parts.only use '(?)' kinds of questions,can only use '(?)' kinds of questions,the two kinds of questions can be used.The results showed that most students can correctly use two syntax,but '(?)' error rate is relatively high,and surprised to find the correct rate of senior class students than the lower classes.Thus analysis of the presumption,there are two reasons for this result. First two classes using different materials and different teaching methods. Therefore the proposed language should correct grammar and explanation. Other point from the survey found that '(?)' use of low frequency, so difficult for students to understand the semantics and syntax features. Cause '(?)' use of the error rate situation. Therefore, this paper present not only the Korean language textbooks '(?)' for more specific tips, and should be, and '(?)' make the appropriate comparison.The fourth chapter is basis of the second and third chapters. Selected the five Korean textbook widely using in universities, and detailed investigation and analysis of the two grammar textbooks. The final study explored effective teaching and learning materials for the purpose of the program prompted.From the study found that Korean textbooks in these instructions and tips, although the use of these two usage to provide some basic help, also shortcoming about explain of semantic functions. Finally, based on principles of education, grammar, content, and eight principles direct the teaching Chinese students.Chapter V is summarized the contents of this thesis, and made several defects of study and point out the future direction.This paper study and research to explore the semantic functions and teaching students using the '(?)' and '(?)' systematically and comprehensively. Hope that this paper helping the Chinese students to study Korean and became foreshadowing the role of research and education.